Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hamstring injury information


Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D.
 Share

Recommended Posts

I found a fantastic post on Reddit about hamstring injuries and average number of games missed.

 

Strength-Speed 774 points 3 hours ago*

They did a study on 38 NFL hamstring strains

Players missed 2.6 ± 3.1 games. Based on MRI, the hamstring injury involved the biceps femoris long head in 34 cases and the proximal and distal hamstrings in 25 and 22 cases, respectively. When < 50% of the muscle was involved, the average number of games missed was 1.8; if > 75%, then 3.2. Ten players had retraction, missing 5.5 games. By MRI, grade I injuries yielded an average of 1.1 missed games; grade II, 1.7; and grade III, 6.4. Players who missed 0 or 1 game had an MRI score of 8.2; 2 or 3 games, 11.1; and 4 or more games, 13.9.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445213/

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Games are thought of as discrete data.  You play in a game or you don't.  Yes / No.  

Here the study is talking about averages.  In statistical terms, averages are continuous.  You can have an average of 2.6 games.  Or 2.3333.  Or 2.19293.  A continuous measure can include any fraction because you're looking at an overall summary of a whole bunch of games.  

 

The most important conclusion of the study is the average of 2.6 games missed for hamstring injuries.  So the best guess is that CMC will miss the next 2 or 3 games.    

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Leeroy Jenkins Ph.D. said:

I found a fantastic post on Reddit about hamstring injuries and average number of games missed.

 

Strength-Speed 774 points 3 hours ago*

They did a study on 38 NFL hamstring strains

Players missed 2.6 ± 3.1 games. Based on MRI, the hamstring injury involved the biceps femoris long head in 34 cases and the proximal and distal hamstrings in 25 and 22 cases, respectively. When < 50% of the muscle was involved, the average number of games missed was 1.8; if > 75%, then 3.2. Ten players had retraction, missing 5.5 games. By MRI, grade I injuries yielded an average of 1.1 missed games; grade II, 1.7; and grade III, 6.4. Players who missed 0 or 1 game had an MRI score of 8.2; 2 or 3 games, 11.1; and 4 or more games, 13.9.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445213/

I can’t trust this until I know what your doctorate is in 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, BlitzMonster said:

Games are thought of as discrete data.  You play in a game or you don't.  Yes / No.  

Here the study is talking about averages.  In statistical terms, averages are continuous.  You can have an average of 2.6 games.  Or 2.3333.  Or 2.19293.  A continuous measure can include any fraction because you're looking at an overall summary of a whole bunch of games.  

 

The most important conclusion of the study is the average of 2.6 games missed for hamstring injuries.  So the best guess is that CMC will miss the next 2 or 3 games.    

I'm going to guess 3 to err on the side of caution

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • KC has a very good defense this year. It is 5th overall. Yes, still worse than last year, but their offense is considerably worse. Their passing D may be their "weakness" but they still allow fewer than 20 ppg. BY completed several deep passes yesterday, and he was able to threaten downfield in ways he didn't seem capable of before the benching. I'm not necessarily worried about his ability to connect deep anymore. What to me was impressive was that he did all this without a run game. We used the pass to set up what little running success we had. Wild.
    • Solid and fair assessment.   I will say, one of the big things I noticed yesterday was that he wasn't shy to step up into the pocket in the face of pressure.  He's trusting the IOL.  And they took care of Chris Jones yesterday.  We had clean pockets but also good success rate vs. pressure which just hasn't been the case with Bryce.   If he has more confidence the OL gets it done and he can navigate and step up for throws, that's huge.  It's one of the biggest things that's held him back.  He was previously bailing quickly and just too easily throwing away or making dead plays.     He was finding his 2nd to 3rd reads within structure/without bailing in the pocket.  That was nice to see, as much concern I have with him.  And the overall limitations will always be there. Time to back it up this week against the Bucs.  
    • Suddenly the Cowgirls look like our best chance for a win remaining. I think the Bucs are playing better than the Falcons of late.  Our lone game versus the dirty birds is in the ATL where we always struggle.  The Cardinals are marginally better than I thought they would be. We are not beating the Eagles, they are starting to roll. I'm saying two at most, next week at home versus the Bucs and the Cowgirls.
×
×
  • Create New...