Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OL looked bad last night


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, NAS said:

OL is our biggest weakness and will only get exposed more if they don't fix it.  I am really hopeful that Brown and Christensen can develop quickly because Daley and Elflein have looked terrible.

You've clearly not been watching Paradis play.

Hell, Moton was abused last night too.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Donald LaFell said:

Regardless of numbers the Texans were fired up and bringing it last night. We went for it on 4th down against conventional wisdom which really pissed them off I’m sure. 

Which would also explain the apparent let down in the second half...they got tired.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Chad_Cota said:

Scott Fitter needs to jump on the phones with this extra long week and see if we can find a lineman.  

Also everyone complaining about Robby Anderson. We don't have the line to take shots down the field. 

This 10 day stretch gives the coaching staff a little longer to get Christensen, Brown and Jordan up to speed.

The play of the iOL is unacceptable right now. I can't imagine they're not going to be testing the waters on a lineup change during this break.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rags said:

I just came to the huddle to make a thread about even during this win streak

 

Cam Irving is bad.

 

Currently leading the charge in the Antione Cason trophy (award for actually detrimental FA signing, won by Whitehead last year) 

Moton got beat a lot last nigh too.  The interior, was clearly the worst.    

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...