Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lol ESPN Hates US


Catsfan69
 Share

Recommended Posts

So I've been watching the morning shows and instead of breaking down our game last night  ad nauseam like they normally would. We get some blurbs about Cmac a couple of blurbs about Darnold.

The Rest of the Morning has been Brady vs Stafford and a must win for the Steelers. 

They will never ever get over us.

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

They literally salivated over us all day yesterday...what more do you want?

Yea they literally didn't say poo about the Texans lol. Usually that is us not getting talked about in the matchup...The Panthers haven't done a god damn thing but lose when they made it to the SB so wtf would anyone care.

Brady is the best football player of all time so no fugin poo a 100 year old QB still winning SBs is going to take up all the time as it should fugin be. How about we first get back to back winning seasons...hmmm....can we do that as a start.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

They literally salivated over us all day yesterday...what more do you want?

An honest breakdown of the game like they seem to do for everyone else.

I'm not talking as much about Sportscenter but Get Up tends to get more into it.

Did you see how much next day stuff there was Tuesday?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, travisura said:

I mean, from a neutral perspective there wasn't really anything that noteworthy coming out of the game, other than CMC's injury, and Davis Mill's debut. Other than that, it's just stuff that Panthers or Texans fans care about.

Darnold was impressive facing adversity with a bad line and no Cmac 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...