Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Texans likely without S Justin Reid


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Should we not play them then? Do we wait until all their players heal before we play them just to please the media? You play whoever shows up. Why should we be penalized if we kick their ass?

Hell no!  You play to win for each other!  Not to get accolades from the pompous ass media.

Could not give less of a fug. After all the years of our injuries and bullshit ref calls etc. I wouldn't care if the starters in all our games were out for the other team.

We had Dan Morgan who had HoF potential end his career early due to injury. We had great seasons taken away from Thomas Davis. Luke just retired based on head injuries or we have a 1st Ballot HoFer still at MLB for at least 4 more years. 

Cam got hurt on some bullshit so everyone misses me with all that. I say good. But honestly it ain't even that  chill I say you god damn right.

Edited by Fox007
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Seltzer said:

Exactly... we are going to have a 4-week gauntlet at the end of the year with the Bills in Buffalo, The Bucs in Charlotte, the Saints in New Orleans, and finishing with the Bucs in Tampa.

We will have a chance to show where we fit in the league hierarchy then... until then...

This is a young team that needs to continue to get better and more confident.  Being able to stack wins, regardless of the circumstances, is the best thing for now.

We're a year away from contention. 

We won't be able to scheme around this Online all year.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, glenwo2 said:

Media rankings can kiss my ass.

Get the "W" however you can get it, is what i say.

Oh I agree. I'm just saying, you can't expect them to rank us in the top 15 if we can't easily defeat a team who has lost their starting QB in exchange for a rookie in his first start, down two WR, and down arguably their best defender. If we can't put them away then I don't think we deserved to be ranked high. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, jayflip said:

Did you even read through the thread before you provided your inevitable shít take on things?

0% in this thread cheered this injury. Most said you play who you play. You are a complete dweeb and should prolly stick to the SaintsReport with Alice and the other swamp rats. 

To be fair, if anyone has cheered for an injury it has been for one of our own. lol!

Conor Lamb GIF by GIPHY News

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They reached for Pickett, so they are not immune to it.  I could see that as well.  I just think the Colts are flying under the radar and they have been too quiet concerning their QB situation--of course, they could think Jones is their guy (they had a good one named Jones a long time ago) but I think they are done with the Richardson experiment.   Even if I believed in Jones, I would still draft a QB--I also read one mock that said the Jets would take Sanders if he falls to 7---I disagree, but I was once wrong and it still bothers me.
    • I just switched to prime video with fanduel south. Will I be able to watch the Canes playoff games still?
    • I mean, you can use that "logic," but the problem is that most practice squad players, backups or average guys don't put the play on film that Wharton did when given their opportunities.  Perhaps you'll end up right, but I don't think that just because a guy has been in a rotation makes him inherently less productive because he gets more snaps. I will say that the KC fans I've seen on social media loved him, and considered him their second best DT,  regardless of his "rotational" status, and generally considered him a dawg, so I'm going to give him the benefit of doubt until he shows otherwise.
×
×
  • Create New...