Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The new batch of Bucs fans on the board

Go To Girl

By Go To Girl,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Cyclonus Newbie

Cyclonus

Posted
Posted

sumpthing is disgusting about that pic man. i couldnt even read what you wrote there. oddly enough ef you said there was going to be a girl catching hotdogs in her mouth, i would say sounds like a good idea. man would i be wrong.

Yeah, I'm normally a fan of women putting hot dog shaped items in their mouths. But that pic is disturbing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
monstercat Newbie

monstercat

Posted
Posted

Does her tongue disgust you?

That, and the brown (mustard I assume/hope) all over her teeth.:ack2:

Anyway, I have to agree that the Bucs fans have been the easiest to get along with since I've been posting here. The Saints fans are too unreasonable lately and the Falcons fans have too much hatred in their hearts, aside from F1P2 anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BucsFanJim Newbie

BucsFanJim

Posted
Posted

Back.

Good game for most of the game.

PantherFanz tailgate was legendary. Thanks Dano and crew.

2 bands!! Great food!! Best pulled pork north of my house.

99.99% of the Panther fans were cool. Good natured smack...etc.

The .01% that sat a few rows behind me?

Asswipe.

Him and his girlfirend/wife whatever.

They kept talking crap to me and about me he last bit of the game. Nothing to do with the team...just me. When I turned around they would shut their yaps and act like it was someone else.

Whatever. They were drunk and probably don't remember the game much less anything else.

Thanks for the hospitality on this board.

Go Bucs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...