Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule on Phil Snow


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Icege said:

Can't help but wonder if Matt Rhule sold Phil Snow as a Dick Lebeau-esque type of guy to Tepper to appeal to the Steelers background.

I doubt very seriously Tepper had any input on his coordinator hires. Rhule is responsible for the entire teams performance so why wouldn't he get to hire who he wanted?

No sir, Rhule knows who helped him get to the big show and he was wise to bring Snow along.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Floppin said:

Rhule is probably the first coach we've ever had that I actually enjoy watching his pressers. The difference is truly amazing. 

I like Snow when he talks football, Brady I turn off...lol

I like Rhule also seems like he know what he is talking about. Has a different energy about him...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cary Kollins said:

Not only a great coach but also seems completely uninterested in being a head coach somewhere, so we don’t have to worry about Buffalo or wherever poaching him.

 

Feels so right having the Panthers back to being a hard hitting badass defense.

Yup, love that about him.  He really does remind of Labeau in a lot of ways.  Also, some Jim Johnson.  He just loves working directly with the players and coming up with schemes and could care less for the spotlight.  I love it.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...