Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Base Defense -- Odd Fronts**


SetfreexX
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Phil Snow looks like a guy you’d see walking out of the nearby gas station with a pack of reds, case of Bud heavy and a bag full of pickled eggs and beef jerky but he is putting on a clinic every Sunday and has been since he strutted into BoA.

I've liked Phil from the jump. He has prototypical grizzled football guy written all over him.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Phil Snow looks like a guy you’d see walking out of the nearby gas station with a pack of reds, case of Bud heavy and a bag full of pickled eggs and beef jerky but he is putting on a clinic every Sunday and has been since he strutted into BoA.

He's the kind of guy that you want to sit down with and listen to him discuss football over a beer or 12.  Imagine the stories he could tell. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the most successful defenses in the last decade didn't seem to truly have a base.

Take for instance the Seahawks and Legion of Boom. Lots and lots of pass rusher types and no real true 3-4 or 4-3. That defense also had lots of versatile players that didn't limit the defense.

Rivera's D the last few years he was here was a very standard looking 4-3 without much of anything different.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I have to admit I thought Snow was some kind of weird Rhule charity case from his bio... But man, that's why Rhule is in charge of a football team and I'm on CarolinaHuddle from my couch.

Snow has surprised so many ways.  If he keeps this defense flying around the field it'll be one of the best we've ever fielded.

I usually huddle from the toilet. But, to each their own

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, cardiackat88. said:

Rivera's D the last few years he was here was a very standard looking 4-3 without much of anything different.

Every pre-season, there'd be a few posters suggesting we change to a 3-4 front, but they'd always be shouted down by the irrefutable logic that we DIDN'T HAVE THE PLAYERS TO DO THAT.

Now all this "versatility" emphasis has changed all that nonsense.  Remember the "amoeba" fronts some DCs employed?

We've now gotten ourselves an "octopus" defense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, cardiackat88. said:

Some of the most successful defenses in the last decade didn't seem to truly have a base.

Take for instance the Seahawks and Legion of Boom. Lots and lots of pass rusher types and no real true 3-4 or 4-3. That defense also had lots of versatile players that didn't limit the defense.

Rivera's D the last few years he was here was a very standard looking 4-3 without much of anything different.

We ran a 3-4 in Rivera's last year, and it was mostly a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • KC has a very good defense this year. It is 5th overall. Yes, still worse than last year, but their offense is considerably worse. Their passing D may be their "weakness" but they still allow fewer than 20 ppg. BY completed several deep passes yesterday, and he was able to threaten downfield in ways he didn't seem capable of before the benching. I'm not necessarily worried about his ability to connect deep anymore. What to me was impressive was that he did all this without a run game. We used the pass to set up what little running success we had. Wild.
    • Solid and fair assessment.   I will say, one of the big things I noticed yesterday was that he wasn't shy to step up into the pocket in the face of pressure.  He's trusting the IOL.  And they took care of Chris Jones yesterday.  We had clean pockets but also good success rate vs. pressure which just hasn't been the case with Bryce.   If he has more confidence the OL gets it done and he can navigate and step up for throws, that's huge.  It's one of the biggest things that's held him back.  He was previously bailing quickly and just too easily throwing away or making dead plays.     He was finding his 2nd to 3rd reads within structure/without bailing in the pocket.  That was nice to see, as much concern I have with him.  And the overall limitations will always be there. Time to back it up this week against the Bucs.  
    • Suddenly the Cowgirls look like our best chance for a win remaining. I think the Bucs are playing better than the Falcons of late.  Our lone game versus the dirty birds is in the ATL where we always struggle.  The Cardinals are marginally better than I thought they would be. We are not beating the Eagles, they are starting to roll. I'm saying two at most, next week at home versus the Bucs and the Cowgirls.
×
×
  • Create New...