Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

TEXANS NEWS - Tyrod Taylor OUT Thursday vs Panthers. Davis Mills to start at QB

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

GRWatcher Mentor

GRWatcher

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

You tell us… the only notable player was Romo when he was a no name…. I can’t really think of any others off the top of my head since then…

Wasn't there a Steeler rookie that played while Roethlisberger was hurt that same year that rolled right over us? Bad memories of that year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Fox007 said:

IDGAF what people bitch about or say

You play who is on your schedule.  We didn't make it up.

I think the schedule is stacking up well in our favor.   By the time we hit the strength of our schedule our team will be clicking.  We have a chance to beat some of those teams on the back end.  

NO team is a pushover and if we come in with the attitude we've already won is when we get beat.

Defense is special and will help us win a couple games. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, cardiackat88. said:

For the first time ever as a Carolina Panthers fan, I am not worried about a rookie and/or no name coming into the game and lighting us up all to hell.

 

Or should I be........?

 

It's the NFL. Every week should be a worry.

I am pleased with the results so far. We just need to keep working on our flaws and stay healthy.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mbarbour21 Proficient

mbarbour21

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Inimicus said:

https://www.si.com/nfl/2021/09/20/texans-confirm-deshaun-watson-out-thursday-panthers

Texans Coach Confirms Deshaun Watson Won't Play Thursday Despite Tyrod Taylor's Injury

 

For Tyrod's sake, they may want to hold him out Thursday so he can recover. I'm not even joking. This defense has been a nightmare for Wilson and Winston. You are looking at an average of 5 sacks and 10 QB hits. Short sample size, but all signs point to much of the same.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, mbarbour21 said:

For Tyrod's sake, they may want to hold him out Thursday so he can recover. I'm not even joking. This defense has been a nightmare for Wilson and Winston. You are looking at an average of 5 sacks and 10 QB hits. Short sample size, but all signs point to much of the same.

they already ruled Taylor out.  They did that yesterday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...