Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What was the explanation for punting on the Jets 33 yard line?


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I just tossed it up to bad coaching. We should have went for it on 4th and 6 from the 33 if we didn’t trust the kicker. Punting made absolutely zero sense.

Also a few drives later when it was 4th and 2 inside the 10 yard line we should have kicked the easy FG to put some points on the board as it was still 0-0. Oh course we end up fumbling and turning the ball over.

Sorry but that is just terrible decision making on all accounts. Even the shitty CBS commentators were wondering wtf Rhule was thinking.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Why in the world would you think that someone has to be 100 percent one way or another? Rhule makes good and bad decisions like everyone else. He can be a genius about one thinkg, and a dumbass about another.

Yeah you can evaluate individual coaching decisions.  The problem is when you blanketly use a coach's judgment as an indictment on the player, i.e. Rhule didn't put Santoso in to attempt a 50-yard FG...ergo Santoso sucks, has a weak leg, etc.

So many people here did the same with Rivera back when he didn't trot out Gano for any 50+ yard FGs.  They assumed that meant Gano has a weak leg when clearly that isn't the case.  Santoso is very much unproven one way or the other, so to use Rhule's judgment call not to let him kick the FG as evidence that Santoso sucks is blindly putting faith in Rhule's judgment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to admit that it pissed me off and had to take a walk. It is just not how I would play. The defense was kicking their tail. And now I won't to see if they keep struggling scoring points. Coaching is a question. They need to STEP UP TOO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ultimately I think it comes down to 1) not trusting the kicker and 2) the defense destroying the Jets offense. At that point the Panthers D was making the Jets look like a middle school team.

 

Rhule was probably assuming they’d score another three and out and be right back in Jets territory a few minutes later.

That said, I think it’s a dumb decision and he should have gone for it using the same logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ace420 said:

They were hoping to pin the jets back inside their 5 yardline, forcing a 3 and out and getting the ball back with good field position. 

It actually wasn't a bad call if you don't think your kicker can make the fg. 

7 out of 10 times it would have worked, bis is the main reason but it wasn't a great kick, and the jets got themselves out of it.

Yeah and Charlton had a terrible game he was terrible the whole game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

As much as I hated the punt, it is good to see Rhule is unsatisfied.

Well, the real problem….is Rhule going into the season with a guy that had shown for a half decade he wasn’t a NFL FG kicker.   Just a very bad kickoff specialist. 

hard to champion Rhule for a problem of his own creation.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't get the Hunter hate. Just imagine his ceiling if he stopped trying to be this 2way freak and focused on one side of the ball 
    • 100%.  You have to play the cards that are dealt.  Not the cards you wish were dealt.
    • I'd say its definitely going to be addressed this off-season.  We went into the last draft with a roster of RBs including:  Chubba, Blackshear, and Miles Sanders. We picked Jonathan Brooks in the second and still signed Rashaad Penny afterwards.  Fast forward....One turned into a top 10 back, 1 is injured/out for most if not all the '25 season, 1 retired, 1 will either take a huge paycut or be cut, and the last is a restricted free agent. We brought in Mike Boone as well. Add him to the free agent list also.  We need a physical option.    Which qualifies:  Ashton Jeanty(Boise St): Overall ranked Top 10. Almost 2k yards after contact, 28 tds. Would take our first rounder. My money would be on an NFC East team selecting him. (97.2 PFF run grade) - 121 forced missed tackles.  Omarion Hampton(UNC): Ranked everywhere from 20 - 59 overall. Consensus #2 back after Jeanty. He'll be a second rounder. 1,222 Yards after contact w/ 15 tds.  (90.5 PFF run grade) - 72 forced missed Tackles Kaleb Johnson(Iowa): Ranked from 38 - 69 depending on which media outlet you prefer but generally #3. 2nd/3rd possibly. 1,060 Yards after contact w/ 21 tds.(86.7 PFF run grade)- 66 forced missed tackles Cam Skattebo: Ranked from the 50's - 104. Every mock I do he ends up BPA at some point. 969 Yards after contact w/ 17 tds(92 PFF Run Grade). Probably the best receiving back of the group. 81 forced missed tackles.  If the '24 and '25 draft classes were combined, IMO the rankings would be, in order: Jeanty, Hampton, Brooks, Johnson, Skattebo. I wouldn't take one high but I'd take one for Chubba and Brooks insurance. 
×
×
  • Create New...