Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Monday Night Football Ravens @ Raiders


TrevorLaurenceTime22
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

In your opinion what category do they better talent outside of offensive line and TE? 
 

keep in mind they were the worst defense in the league last year. 

There weren't the worse defense in the league last year, they were pretty close to us.

I think we play better, on defense especially, but that they have, better talent overall. 

Not by a lot, but they have a talent edge on us, but they just play worse.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've really started to feel Perryman only signed with us because it was the best deal available to him and then drug ass once he had to report and embellished injuries so he could go elsewhere.  

It sucks, but I just find it interesting that he suddenly saw the light when it came to vaccination once he was dealt.  Looks like he's played well tonight...

Also, sucks for McCoy.  Didnt see the play he injured on, but getting carted off and his expressions combined with how they were treating that leg, it looks like he may be done.  It sucks bc I really loved having him here when he was here and would've loved to retain him, but it seems like his body has broken down.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Madwolf said:

There weren't the worse defense in the league last year, they were pretty close to us.

I think we play better, on defense especially, but that they have, better talent overall. 

Not by a lot, but they have a talent edge on us, but they just play worse.

 

They literally just showed on the screen that the raiders were last in the league on scoring defense and second to last in yards….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...