Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cowboys at Bucs - NFL opener GameDay thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

He is 44 and still playing at an elite level Peyton Manning broke down at 39 Drew Brees at 41...  He will likely become the second oldest quarterback to start a game this season (First in the modern era) that's it's insane I'm surprised more haven't adopted his wacky diet.

 

its not diet, tom brady has never had a bad oline, rarely does he get sacked. thats why hes still healthy. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

He helps his oline look better by getting the ball out so fast.

Yea he actually plays QB the way I've always heard it coached....just usually it doesn't happen like that obv. Like the throws the ball well before the WR even breaks on the route....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You gotta be a masochist to want to play CB in today's game. Breathe in a receiver and flags litter the field. Be in perfect position to defend a pass and get two hand shoved to the turf and the entire football world celebrates Brady's greatness. Those are some hard to swallow pills right there.

 

Its lame how easily the flags come out. Quite frankly I'm fine with more contact both ways its just preposterous to ask them to play without hand fighting/checking which is just football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fox007 said:

Its lame how easily the flags come out. Quite frankly I'm fine with more contact both ways its just preposterous to ask them to play without hand fighting/checking which is just football.

I'd settle for it simply to be called fairly. Every flag in the refs' pockets would've been laying on the field if the roles were reversed on that play and that's just straight up handicapping the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
    • Walker is a good player and comes from a great defensive minded school but there a questions about him. He could be a superstar or bust.  You trade down and will get a player with similar concerns and you jump into the middle of the second round where there are some good players.  YOU'RE not getting a 1st next year and a 2nd for 8. These mock simulators give you fair value for the most part. I've tried and most counter offers were rejected.  We trade down get a good first round graded player and jump into the middle of 2nd round and not having to wait for 57.  Plus if a stud falls to the late first or early 2nd round we could package 46 and 57 and get him. 
    • It's just a burden to throw a dart if you're so green. Dan has his work cut out for him.
×
×
  • Create New...