Most vulnerable positions to waiver/free agency.

[La Pantera]

20 minutes ago, CRA said:

we just added a DE

watch the next add be a RB

Seeing as we only have 2 RBs , that's a safe bet.

[Basbear]

Many already listed, I will add backup DT. Currently that spot is very green. Maybe like another Flenchter deal, fake a injury and sign a vet.

 

[KB_fan]

49 minutes ago, davos said:

G/C Elf/Paradis backup plans (They seem committed to Brady at T, can't trust Daley to be healthy)

Any chance we can continue to develop Tecklenburg as our next center?

[NAS]

IDK, but I've never seen a 53 man roster with 5 TEs and only 4 CBs.

[davos]

3 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

Any chance we can continue to develop Tecklenburg as our next center?

With him not on the team, no.  PS, maybe.  I see a void even if Elf can back up Paradis.

[davos]

1 minute ago, NAS said:

IDK, but I've never seen a 53 man roster with 5 TEs and only 4 CBs.

Rhule is always so coy; the fact he said it's fluid means we could still make a handful of moves and just not one or two.  We're still 3-5 moves away from the week 1 roster IMO. 

[OldhamA]

1 hour ago, Tommy Jone said:

LB, maybe even low-key S.  Depth at LB may force Chinn to play that position again.

No chance, they've got him inked in as a starting S. 

[Jackie Lee]

4 minutes ago, NAS said:

IDK, but I've never seen a 53 man roster with 5 TEs and only 4 CBs.

I really doubt we stick with 5 TE's and 5 DT's, last year was 2 and 4 I think

[KB_fan]

19 minutes ago, davos said:

With him not on the team, no.  PS, maybe.  I see a void even if Elf can back up Paradis.

Agree. (Obviously I was assuming Tecklenburg makes the PS again...)

[Tommy Jone]

57 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

No chance, they've got him inked in as a starting S. 

That's great and everything, but once the starters at LB begin going down it may be a different story