Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

YOU'RE ALLOWED TO BRING BACK TWO PANTHERS IN THEIR PRIME TO THIS YEARS TEAM... WHO AND WHY?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

I mean legitimate reasons, Cam played with coaches with that same mindset. Jake had 1/4 the talent Cam had. 

I think Jake was a better passer. Cam had a stronger arm.

I think Jake had more clutch ability. If we were within a score at the end of the game he would win it or put us in a position to win including that beautiful 90 plus yard drive with less than 3 minutes left in the Superbowl. 

 

Look if you grew up with Cam it's a very good reason why you may idolize him.

I was already a grown man when the Panthers came along. I'd drive to Clemson from Raleigh to see them. I've seen all of our QBs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I think Jake was a better passer. Cam had a stronger arm.

I think Jake had more clutch ability. If we were within a score at the end of the game he would win it or put us in a position to win including that beautiful 90 plus yard drive with less than 3 minutes left in the Superbowl. 

 

Look if you grew up with Cam it's a very good reason why you may idolize him.

I was already a grown man when the Panthers came along. I'd drive to Clemson from Raleigh to see them. I've seen all of our QBs.

 

More clutch?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.espn.com/blog/carolina-panthers/post/_/id/31017/overlooked-cam-newton-as-clutch-as-brady-rodgers-and-brees%3fplatform=amp

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam Newton, Christian McCaffrey, Robby Anderson, DJ Moore, Dan Arnold, Terrace Marshall . . . I'm not sure I can name a better offensive skill group ever.  Kurt Warner, Marshall Faulk, Isaac Bruce, Torry Holt, Az-Azhir Hakim, Ricky Proehl maybe?

Toss in Jordan Gross at LT and hand us the next three Lombardis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I think Jake was a better passer. Cam had a stronger arm.

I think Jake had more clutch ability. If we were within a score at the end of the game he would win it or put us in a position to win including that beautiful 90 plus yard drive with less than 3 minutes left in the Superbowl. 

 

Look if you grew up with Cam it's a very good reason why you may idolize him.

I was already a grown man when the Panthers came along. I'd drive to Clemson from Raleigh to see them. I've seen all of our QBs.

 

I was as well and I watched Jake play long before Cam. 

Jake was a career 59% completion guy, Cam was at 60% its a wash, Jake had zero in the rushing department.

Its cool you like Jake because reasons, but the reasons are not because he was better than Cam in his prime at anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam and Gross, but I feel like Cam is an unfair pick all things considered since the mix of positional weakness and what we have makes him such an easy pick.  If we exclude Cam it becomes more interesting, just because then its a question of Gross + Kalil, or Gross + Luke, or even Jake + Gross?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

I was as well and I watched Jake play long before Cam. 

Jake was a career 59% completion guy, Cam was at 60% its a wash, Jake had zero in the rushing department.

Its cool you like Jake because reasons, but the reasons are not because he was better than Cam in his prime at anything.

That's not even an honest discussion. Peak Cam was so much better than peak Jake. That's like comparing Pat Mahomes to Andy Dalton.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We could easily pick apart yesterday’s game: dropped passes, blown coverages, bad tackling and red zone issues to name a few. But it was clear that this wasn’t the same team from earlier in the season. They fought back and hung with the champs until the end. That’s what I was excited to see and it gives me hope that we’re on the right track.
    • I think BY played well today and exceeded expectations. I will temper future expectations as he has to string together many games of consistent quality. One game doesn’t convince me that he is a franchise QB or even a guy you want to stick with for another season. One game doesn’t erase all the negative play and limitations from the past couple of years. I hope he balls out and continues to get better but for me the verdict is still out   That said, I think he gave the team and fans hope yesterday which is a lot more than what we had when we woke up Sunday morning. 
    • He was vastly improved today and we need to see more of Bryce the rest of the season to continue evaluate him in order to decide what the heck to do with him at the end of the season. He must play at least like this and improve more from here the rest of the season in order for me to keep him. No more 123 yard passing games and want to see at least this output weekly from him. If this is Bruce improving slowly over time then Canales is even better with developing QB's than I thought he was but still too early to tell and we need to see him the rest of the way as he has at very least earned back the starting gig moving forward.
×
×
  • Create New...