Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

1st Round Redo: Horn vs Slater


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, hepcat said:

Go back to the draft after watching that pathetic performance by the offensive line.

Would you draft Slater over Horn?

I would. Every time.

Jaycee is obviously going to be a good player. But so is Slater. All indications on the Chargers is that he’s looking dominant already.

Corner is easier to find talent for in later rounds than LT. Could have drafted a corner where they drafted Christiansen. And has LT locked up and made the entire offensive line look better.

Maybe Christiansen will work out at LT. Maybe big money Moton moves over there. Either way I think I’d rather be concerned about who is playing corner than LT.

What good is having an offense if you can’t get a stop?  We were terrible getting off the field.

The front office had a plan and they executed it.  I can’t figure out why y’all are so damn salty?

You can’t correct a decade of dumbassery in 1 offseason.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this will fall on deaf ears, but here goes anyway.

 

1. C'mon man. It's Pre-Season. There is no Scheming, there is no Game Planning.

2. Pitt. plays a 3-4. Do you really think we have practiced against that?

3. Scott was the starting LT.

Lastly. The 1st team only punted once.

 

Was the Oline pretty? Not really. But under the circumstances, it was good film for evaluation. Which, after all, is what Pre Season is all about.

Edited by iamhubby1
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Your "Chicken Little" comments, "negativity" and "bashing" comments are a bit overblown, if not an outright mischaracterization.

I am not changing my mind. If we don't do something about the O-line based upon this preseason's play, then I predict that you'll be lauding in January how our line was middling at best. And, no, we don't get to start out with a bar of middle-of-the-pack this season when we were the exact same last season.

 

If we don't keep improving as we hopefully will then we won't even be middling.  And with all the new pieces and new coaches, last year and this year are completely different.  What hopefully stays the same is that we improve throughout the year. And hopefully not end each year on a long losing streak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

I know this will fall on deaf ears, but here goes anyway.

 

1. C'mon man. It's Pre-Season. There is no Scheming, there is no Game Planning.

2. Pitt. plays a 3-4. Do you really think we have practiced against that?

3. Scott was the starting LT.

Lastly. The 1st team only punted once.

 

Was the Oline pretty? Not really. But under the circumstances, it was good film for evaluation. Which, after all, is what Pre Season is all about.

It absolutely will fall on deaf ears while folks keep complaining as if this were November. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

It absolutely will fall on deaf ears while folks keep complaining as if this were November. 

 

I just felt the need to add some actual context. Even though I know it was probably a waste of time.

 

I mean, no, it was not perfect. But I thought the line played well. It may have been against the 2s, but they ran the ball well, and protected well.  With Scott at LT.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...