Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brady Christensen in at Left Tackle...


firstdayfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I just don’t want 2 rookies on one side. Would prefer:

Brady-Daley-Paradis-Brown-Moton

but don’t think Elf and Miller have lost their spots (yet) so it’s:

Moton-Elf-Paradis-Miller-Brady C

but Daley has an in right now if Miller or Elf are benched. Then comes Brown after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About Brown:  He was very active.  I liked what I saw, but he got confused a bit.  Now, that could be Tecklenburg as much as anything.

The player I thought sucked the most?  Paradis.

I need to watch it again, but I was tracing pressure back to A gap all night long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

About Brown:  He was very active.  I liked what I saw, but he got confused a bit.  Now, that could be Tecklenburg as much as anything.

The player I thought sucked the most?  Paradis.

I need to watch it again, but I was tracing pressure back to A gap all night long.

Paradis is hot garbage. Maybe instead of Elfein at G, try him at C. Have Brown and Miller/Daley as our Gs.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

Paradis is hot garbage. Maybe instead of Elfein at G, try him at C. Have Brown and Miller/Daley as our Gs.

I like that idea.  Paradis lead the league in "help ups" last year.  Saying to his QB, "My man just pancaked you...Let me help you up."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, davos said:

I just don’t want 2 rookies on one side. Would prefer:

Brady-Daley-Paradis-Brown-Moton

but don’t think Elf and Miller have lost their spots (yet) so it’s:

Moton-Elf-Paradis-Miller-Brady C

but Daley has an in right now if Miller or Elf are benched. Then comes Brown after that.

I understand the rookie concern. But they are better than the vets right now. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

About Brown:  He was very active.  I liked what I saw, but he got confused a bit.  Now, that could be Tecklenburg as much as anything.

The player I thought sucked the most?  Paradis.

I need to watch it again, but I was tracing pressure back to A gap all night long.

The rookies are not playing until they learn all the protections.  The sad part is the current starters know them and they still can't protect worth a damn.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ironic that the Huddle has been obsessing about LT all preseason, when we had a complete dumpster fire tonight on the interior.  And will somebody please explain to Paradis that rollerblades are not game day approved equipment.

Edited by bythenbrs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

Ironic that the Huddle has been obsessing about LT all preseason, when we had a complete dumpster fire tonight on the interior.  And will somebody please explain to Paradis that rollerblades are not game day approved equipment.

That's an interesting point. To be fair, my OP was to simply point out that BC was finally getting a shot to play on the left, something I don't think he's even done in camp.

But you're absolutely right, if you go back and watch those drives in the first half the pressure was usually coming from the interior. Often paradis, but elf and miller missed blocks too.

Makes me wonder if it was more of a scheme thing than anything else. The Steelers were doing a lot of stunts (although paradis did get flat out beat more than once).

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...