Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jets Lose Another Defensive starter


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

I hate to hear that for the player but the show must go on. No excuse to lose this home game. There are factors that give us concern about the roster but this pass rush should be able to give Wilson trouble and in turn give the offense plenty to work with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, t96 said:

Nobody thought that Aints game was an "easy dub" even with their top 3 wideouts not playing, and anyone who did is an idiot. Last year's Aints team with Brees overall was still better than our team last year even without their top 3 WRs. We really haven't had any letdowns from a Rhule team yet.

Eh, the Falcons and Broncos losses were kind of a letdown. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, NAS said:

Wilson is going to be a problem on offense, he can sling it!

Hopefully he'll sling it to Horn instead of his target. 

4 hours ago, Smithers said:

This just about guarantees 5 Panthers touchdowns and 5 missed extra points 

sh-t.  Forgot about Slye.  😑

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Castavar said:

All this has the makings of a complete letdown come week 1. Jets top two FA acquisitions out. Should be an easy win right? Not for the Panthers. They will find a way to make it interesting.

Remember when the Saints top 3 WRs were out and everybody thought it was an easy dub? If I remember correctly they went on to still scorch our defense and win.

I feel like I remember that Giants game when they had no WRs but torched us. 
 

Also getting beat by the Saints after Katrina sucked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...