Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dak Prescott’s shoulder


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

 

Panthers week 4 opponent appears to be having a slight setback with his shoulder.  Cowboys Twitter had an odd tweet last week saying nothing to be alarmed but Dak is getting another MRI.

We’ve seen this situation go on with us with Cam.  
 

Now Dallas is our week 4 opponent after

Jets without Lawson, and their Rookie QB struggling in Camp and LT coming in out of shape.

the Saints with ? at QB.  Lattimore potential suspended.  And who knows with Michael Thomas.

then Week 3 the Texans without Watson and JJ Watt

 

 

Edited by ncfan
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, onmyown said:

I long for the day when another teams’ demise does not determine our success.

But alas it’s all we have. I’ll take it.

None of those teams seemed to have a problem beating our asses once Cam got broken. Fug them, we should beat them all by as many points as possible. No bullshitting around trying to hold onto a 7 point lead. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stars are aligning. Momentum is HUGE in the NFL. If we win our first 4 games (which are all very winnable) and start 4-0, its a huge confidence booster to the whole team. Darnold might start believing in himself again, the defense will be full of themselves and ball ever harder, the coaching staff will be extra focused, and pretty much the whole team will be buying in to this regime. Anything under 3-1 and I am very disappointed.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PootieNunu said:

None of those teams seemed to have a problem beating our asses once Cam got broken. Fug them, we should beat them all by as many points as possible. No bullshitting around trying to hold onto a 7 point lead. 

We decided to cut loose Cam after a couple of years worth of shoulder injuries. Dallas has decided to hang in there with Dak.  You reap what you sow.

Sadly, they gave him a new contract so they'll be stuck with him for a couple more years hoping and praying he gets back to his old ways.

You put the best 53 on the field.  It isn't our problem that they won't have their star. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DaveThePanther2008 said:

We decided to cut loose Cam after a couple of years worth of shoulder injuries. Dallas has decided to hang in there with Dak.  You reap what you sow.

Sadly, they gave him a new contract so they'll be stuck with him for a couple more years hoping and praying he gets back to his old ways.

You put the best 53 on the field.  It isn't our problem that they won't have their star. 

This. I dont see any reason to take pity on any of those teams that were listed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Other than being the offseason and there isn't much to talk about, why does anyone worry about the cap? We can do whatever we want and still have cap space. You don't think the front office hasn't already figured it out and what they intend to do. Me I am just sitting back and watching. After all my job isn't on the line if we lose. Although at my age we don't have forever if I am going to live to see us play in another superbowl
    • I get the TD's and I pointed it out, but like I said, when Burrow had more than double the TD's than Geno had, I think Higgins increased TDs compared to DK was more a product of Burrow and the Bengals offense than because of him vs DK as WRs. When one of their QB's finished 4th in MVP voting despite missing the playoffs and the other was just traded for a late 3rd round pick and replaced by Sam Darnold, I think that's a tough narrative to brush aside to just look at raw stats as well. Again, swap DK and Higgins last year, do you honestly believe DK wouldn't have put up better stats than Higgins did? Contracts and trade compensation aside, I'm taking DK over Higgins 100 out of 100 times, there is no debate about it for me.
    • More TDs last year in less games (double the TDs) and more yards per game. Those are some tough stats to brush aside. Career stats are good but we are wanting the player for what they are currently. DK had some drop issues too. 
×
×
  • Create New...