QB Controversy

[Mr. Scot]

2 minutes ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

We're sitting at 12pages, and look you still engaged in using foul language just to get a point across, which was once again wrong, like so many other things you try to stay on the fence about...

Cause you were so right about PJ

A pretty sizable portion of those 12 pages is people calling you a dumbass.

On that point, there doesn't seem to be much controversy at all.

Edited August 19, 2021 by Mr. Scot

[Varking]

1 minute ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

If you can get over Darnold's past ..get over PJ's

Since you can’t get over Darnold’s past.. why are so accepting of PJs? 

[LinvilleGorge]

1 minute ago, CPsinceDay1 said:

If you can get over Darnold's past ..get over PJ's

The past is usually the best indicator of the future. It's no secret on here that I have serious doubts that Darnold is going to recover from his.

[CPsinceDay1]

3 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I think PJs stats are deceptive and he could still be a good backup IF he can learn to protect the ball a bit better.  I like his energy and willingness to push the ball down the field... It was a stark contrast to Teddy.

Not sold on Darnold as long term solution at QB1, but I'm hopeful. He has the physical tools.  Only question if he has it between his ears to play smart.

No qb controversy in Carolina anyway. Just a couple of Huddle threads.  When there's real controversy... It's much worse hahaah.

Did you see how the Sam Defenders jump in here as soon they found out the boy might play....

Why, cause they scared, scared he might not perform well, hell Grier might look better in game time action than Darnold

 

[CPsinceDay1]

2 minutes ago, Varking said:

Since you can’t get over Darnold’s past.. why are so accepting of PJs? 

Darnold's past stretches over 3 years, never saw it in him, even before he was drafted...

Always liked PJ...

[Varking]

Just now, CPsinceDay1 said:

Darnold's past stretches over 3 years, never saw it in him, even before he was drafted...

Always liked PJ...

PJ is older then Sam and has worse efficiency numbers almost across the board. I don’t get the love. We all hope he can be a solid backup but even that’s not set in stone. He isn’t starter material at a 8.9% INT rate. 

[CPsinceDay1]

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

A pretty sizable portion of those 12 pages is people calling you a dumbass.

On that point, there doesn't seem to be much controversy at all.

Question who's the DUMBASS who said PJ wasn't a NFL QB...

 

[Mr. Scot]

Just now, CPsinceDay1 said:

Question who's the DUMBASS who said PJ wasn't a NFL QB...

Igo, originally. But I agreed and still do.

At this point, we're still hoping that he develops into a solid backup. If someone who's already a solid backup becomes available, it wouldn't surprise me to see him gone.

But whether that happens or not, he has no shot of unseating Darnold as the starter. The mere suggestion of it is delusional and just plain stupid.

[CRA]

The huddle exist in part to argue bad football takes until the cows come home. 

if you can’t do that without name calling you are going to get a vacation.    That’s the overdue warning.  

 

[CPsinceDay1]

10 minutes ago, CRA said:

The huddle exist in part to argue bad football takes until the cows come home. 

if you can’t do that without name calling you are going to get a vacation.    That’s the overdue warning.  

 

Exactly who are you talking about???

Because I've never called anyone out by name...but have received a fair amount of warnings for basically doing the exact same thing as some other huddlers...

Now if you Talking about mr.scot....it really doesn't bother me, my teacher always said those who are less intelligent can only remember so many words, I just took it he was home school.

[Madwolf]

As someone who is not certain if Darnold is going to be good, or get us a draft pick, there is still no doubt in my mind that PJ is solidly a backup. 

And we're having this conversation because he had a mediocre game against 2nd and 3rd stringers.

[glenwo2]

3 hours ago, mav1234 said:

I think PJs stats are deceptive and he could still be a good backup IF he can learn to protect the ball a bit better.  I like his energy and willingness to push the ball down the field... It was a stark contrast to Teddy.

Not sold on Darnold as long term solution at QB1, but I'm hopeful. He has the physical tools.  Only question if he has it between his ears to play smart.

No qb controversy in Carolina anyway. Just a couple of Huddle threads.  When there's real controversy... It's much worse hahaah.

Hard to "play smart" when you have to play "Hero Ball" 100% of the time because you had ZERO weapons all around you in NY and had to deal with a nitwit as your Head Coach.

I think he'll be fine. 

Edited August 19, 2021 by glenwo2

[glenwo2]

3 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

A pretty sizable portion of those 12 pages is people calling you a dumbass.

On that point, there doesn't seem to be much controversy at all.

OOF!! OOF!! 

[CPsinceDay1]

1 minute ago, glenwo2 said:

OOF!! OOF!! 

Even if you wear a mask, you will not be permitted inside Bank of America sounding like that...have you been vaccinated???