Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers Training Camp - Tuesday Thread


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

LOL

Scott and Erving swing too.  Really  BC  played left in college and is practicing RT now, so he swings too.   So all 4 tackles can play either side in a pinch.   

I don't think that is an accident.
 

Everyone keeps over thinking this  versatility deal.

On game day you usually only have 8 OL active, you don’t have a backup for each spot, because of this every team has a multitude of players that can play multiple positions on the line.

All that matters is if LT1 gets hurt who fills in? Who fills in if RT2  gets hurt?  More times than not it is some combination of three guys, not 4 like some fans think.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Everyone keeps over thinking this  versatility deal.

On game day you usually only have 8 OL active, you don’t have a backup for each spot, because of this every team has a multitude of players that can play multiple positions on the line.

All that matters is if LT1 gets hurt who fills in? Who fills in if RT2  gets hurt?  More times than not it is some combination of three guys, not 4 like some fans think.

 

 

Yes.  I also think the question becomes, if LT1 doesn't dress, we have to start with LT2 and he gets hurt, what do we do?   Its seems unlikely to have 2 go down in a game, but not as unlikely to have to start LT2 and he goes down.  If LT3 has never taken reps there, oops.

We spent half the season starting various LT2's last year and it looks like we're headed in that direction again.

Pat Meyer knows what he is going.  He did more with less last year that I thought possible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

I'm not gonna lie...  I'm not as down on our OL as many are.  I don't think they'll be worldbeaters by any means, but I think the talent level is as high as it's been in years.  That being said, I'm growing concerned with how it is being handled.  The non-committal approach to LT, and having had Moton taken snaps over there throughout camp, even when everyone was healthy, then having him at RT, then back at LT, then shuffling other guys around like Elflein and Tecklenberg...  it's kind of like the old cliche about QBs - if you have two, then you have none.

It seems like they're trying to come up with contingency plans if someone gets hurt or what have you, when our biggest issue is having an actual solidified starting 5.

Hard to do that when players get dinged up. In training camp and preseason,  ya want them to stay healthy, versus during the season,  there will be some playing through injuries. 

That's not what holds back solidifying a starting line. That is due to lack of padded practices.  Thank you CBA. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Hard to do that when players get dinged up. In training camp and preseason,  ya want them to stay healthy, versus during the season,  there will be some playing through injuries. 

That's not what holds back solidifying a starting line. That is due to lack of padded practices.  Thank you CBA. 

 

That makes a lot of sense. If you dig a little deeper, you could say the only players who actually need padded practices, are the two lines. They absolutely need padded practices.

Of course there are exceptions. Tackling drills, which I'm not even sure they do those anymore. So very little need for other positions to wear them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It amuses me how Goff's name the last few years is often used to compare to subpar or underperforming QB's. Now on the surface I get it. But when you look at his numbers he's been the same QB all along. He's improved his completion % but even with the Rams he averaged 63.4. And that Super Bowl he played in they should have won honestly. If we can get a QB as good as Goff I'll be pretty damn pleased.
    • And it remains to be seen if Goff has that ability or not. Plenty of very good QB's like Goff were not able to get over those playoff humps. Matt Ryan, Kirk Cousins, etc. You can still be an upper tier QB and never get over that hurdle. McVay just thought(and hasn't been wrong yet) Goff was never going to be that guy.
    • You literally simply have to think logically for either of those guys. Smith is locked up on a deal for 2025, so we would have to trade for him or he gets cut. Neither of those scenarios are likely in the first place.  Wilson will be 37 in 2025. Why on earth would he have any interest in a situation that is far worse than he was given in Denver and wasn't able to win there? He's a guy that can drop into any ready to win franchise in the NFL and immediately elevate their chances of winning(provided they already have QB issues).  Frankly, that is either speculation that even David Newton should be embarrassed by or it shows how disconnected with reality some people in our organization are.   I do agree with him on getting a veteran QB, however. That's our best chance to keep developing our talent.
×
×
  • Create New...