Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jaycee Horn again - Improving


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Don't get me wrong, I want Horn to be good . . . but that video . . . Horn had the leverage the entire time.  In a game, you simply don't throw that route.  Or the receiver options to an outbreaking route so the leverage works in his favor.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Don't get me wrong, I want Horn to be good . . . but that video . . . Horn had the leverage the entire time.  In a game, you simply don't throw that route.  Or the receiver options to an outbreaking route so the leverage works in his favor.

To be fair, it looks like a one on one drill.

Can't choose not to throw in a drill.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

I mean, isn't taking away the receiver option one of the primary objectives of a cb?

Of course, but holding this particular rep up as evidence that Horn is "the answer" for us outside is ludicrous.

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

To be fair, it looks like a one on one drill.

Can't choose not to throw in a drill.

Agree.  That's why I don't think this particular clip is all that exciting.  Horn lined up with the right leverage for the route.  After that, not much to see.  Had the route been outbreaking or deep, we might have had an opportunity to evaluate something.

I'm excited and hopeful that Horn turns into another Gamble / Norman / Bradberry.  I want to see something special.  Something that really shows a spark of that potential.

We'll know a whole lot more in 11 days.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Of course, but holding this particular rep up as evidence that Horn is "the answer" for us outside is ludicrous.

Agree.  That's why I don't think this particular clip is all that exciting.  Horn lined up with the right leverage for the route.  After that, not much to see.  Had the route been outbreaking or deep, we might have had an opportunity to evaluate something.

I'm excited and hopeful that Horn turns into another Gamble / Norman / Bradberry.  I want to see something special.  Something that really shows a spark of that potential.

We'll know a whole lot more in 11 days.

All indications are that Horn is going to be drastically better than Gamble, Norman, Bradberry or any other CB this team has ever had.  I think you may be setting your sights a little low.  How about the next Jalen Ramsey? 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

Hes got a lot more potential than Norman or Bradberry for sure. Gamble is a much bettee comparison and he's still got more upside 

I would sure hope he has more upside than all of those guys - 23 years in the league between them and 2 Pro Bowls....at the #8 pick his upside better be 4-5 PB's at least and a few 1st Team All Pro's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BrianS said:

Of course, but holding this particular rep up as evidence that Horn is "the answer" for us outside is ludicrous.

Except he's apparently been absolutely smothering everyone he's covered so far in camp. Just like above, he's been making every receiver an ugly option for the QB.

There's been nothing in any practice to suggest he isn't "the answer" nor has there been anything to cause anyone to even doubt it.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, BrianS said:

Don't get me wrong, I want Horn to be good . . . but that video . . . Horn had the leverage the entire time.  In a game, you simply don't throw that route.  Or the receiver options to an outbreaking route so the leverage works in his favor.

 

Do we know it was 11 on 11 / 7 on 7 and not just 1 on 1?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trying to help those 3 folks who hate this move.    In 2025 2.75 million is basically the new "vet" minimum.    They still need #3 RB and returner, draft could/should be the lane for that.    There's no downside to this move, they could cut with little effect and replace with your chosen rookie.   
    • Is it though? Even looking at just this past year, DK played 3 more games and had 81 more yards than Higgins had, but he also did it on less catches, with DK averaging 15 yards per catch and Higgins with 12.5. Yes, Higgins had 10 TDs to DK's 5, but I'd say that was far less about the WRs than the QBs, seeing as Burrow had 43 TDs (and only 9 INTs) to Geno's 21 TDs (and 15 INTs).  Swap the two of them last year and DK puts up better stats with Burrow as his QB than Higgins did, no doubt about it in my mind. DK has also only missed 3 games in his career, Higgins has missed 5 in each of the last 2 seasons. People here complain about our WR speed (and it's many people's biggest issue with T-Mac in the draft), but Higgins ran a 4.59 40 and DK ran a 4.33. DK has only played one more season than Higgins but he has 1,730 yards and 14 TDs more than Higgins, despite playing with the ghost of Russell Wilson and Geno Smith, while Higgins has had Burrow. To me, there is no debate, DK is a significantly better WR than Higgins.  Give him Burrow as his QB during his career and his numbers would dwarf what Higgins has put up.
    • Thanks to @CarolinaLivin for the Juan-like work!  
×
×
  • Create New...