Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers are STILL interested in Deshaun Watson


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Ace420 said:

Yea, I wod say exposing himself.is probably the only real crime he committed. Other than that, I guess it is considered "sexual assault" now to ask a woman for sex... 

I still want Watson for the right price, and I have always considered most of this case to be a feminist witch hunt. It seems like he would be charged with a crime by now if anyone can prove he did anything wrong.

Most likely this is women trying to shake him down for money.

Now I will be pooed to hell by all the feminists and white knights who believe women can do no wrong and think a man should go to prison every time a woman makes any claim at all.

Tom Cruise What GIF

This is literally a completely absurd take and I consider myself pretty middle of the road on the whole Watson issue.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ace420 said:

Yea, I wod say exposing himself.is probably the only real crime he committed. Other than that, I guess it is considered "sexual assault" now to ask a woman for sex... 

I still want Watson for the right price, and I have always considered most of this case to be a feminist witch hunt. It seems like he would be charged with a crime by now if anyone can prove he did anything wrong.

Most likely this is women trying to shake him down for money.

Now I will be pooed to hell by all the feminists and white knights who believe women can do no wrong and think a man should go to prison every time a woman makes any claim at all.

I understand. Not everybody is a saint. People can be manipulated.

Not everybody wakes up with good thoughts. Most of us don't get that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, cookinbrak said:

 

Yeah but he also has proof that the women who he did that with consented to it. His lawyer also had about 20 other women massage therapist give affidavits that he never touched them. Context is key in these situations and if they consented to sex thats blows their credibility a bunch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, La Pantera said:

I believe he purchased plane tickets to have "massage therapist" flown in. If there is a paper trail and he brought those women in from out of state for the purpose of sex. He could be charged in trafficking. Will he...? Who knows.

Not quite. You have to prove he paid for sex. He can fly anyone he wants anywhere he wants if the sex was not paid for. So like if you tip a waitress $100 and take her home thats not trafficking nor prostitution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, onmyown said:

Solicitation is a very broad word and the details determine if it’s federal or not. So far this is civil so the DA doesn’t matter. We absolutely do not know what there is enough evidence of to take to court or not, including the accusations aside from solicitation. What you see in the media is probably 1/100 of all the details. This is an ongoing pending civil case/investigation, the public are not privy to most details.
 

And a DA certainly will take a case that may or may not have enough evidence based on the situation. I’ve been in numerous cases of he said she said domestic violence cases brought to court by the DA. Hell, more than one where the victim no longer wanted to proceed, and when that happens it’s extremely unlikely anything in court will either. Determining credibility of evidence is largely a responsibility of the court/judge, not the DA.

 

Well as I said. Its probably the only thing they can charge him for and prove. If they can even prove that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know you're in a helluva spot where your best defense is saying, "Listen, I'm a creep. I specifically hired these female massage therapists with the express intention of whipping out my dick and seeing if they'd take the bait. I didn't force them into anything, but yeah I intentionally created these scenarios with the express purpose of creating this very awkward and intensely creepy situation hoping I'd get laid because I've watched way too much Pornhub and it seems to be a setup that works well."

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You know you're in a helluva spot where your best defense is saying, "Listen, I'm a creep. I specifically hired these female massage therapists with the express intention of whipping out my dick and seeing if they'd take the bait. I didn't force them into anything, but yeah I intentionally created these scenarios with the express purpose of creating this very awkward and intensely creepy situation hoping I'd get laid because I've watched way too much Pornhub and it seems to be a setup that works well."

Says Robert Kraft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been sort of reading this thread..

The Deshaun Watson lawsuits: new information—and more context - Sports Illustrated

I don't know what state you all live in but, I know in at least 50 states (US of course) some of these allegations constitute sexual assault. 

Underlined allegations because as of now, they're allegations. 

Oh and.. some of these allegations refer to the felony degree of sexual assault. 

 Again....guilty until proven innocent, or is it the other way around?

You can never tell anymore. 🤔

And let me make this clear. Still don't want him here, no way no how.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...