Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is "My Life Dont Matter" actually Chuck?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

First off-  YOU MERE PEASANTS SHOULD KNOW THAT CHUCK IS IMMORTALL!!

 

 

I try to get along with everyone, just who i am. Chuck rubs a few posters the wrong way. Yes he can post too much in short time and hasnt grasped how to deal with insults form posters. I dont take him too serious, that one method works GREAT for old chuck. Hes got opinions like others and when other posters disagrees, a poo show follows. 

 

Plus say what you will about his posting and interaction between members, he is VERY passionate about Charlotte sports. Since his many bans, hes gone troll mode, just like in this thread. I personally like non-troll chuck, different opinions are welcomed in my world...

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Don't know about the size of the trolls, but there may not be a bigger piece of cinematic dog crap than that movie 😕

They are most commonly depicted as giants in norse mythology. 

I updated my comment with a link, I can add it here also. A Norwegian movie, might be just as crappy.. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kass said:

They are most commonly depicted as giants in norse mythology. 

I updated my comment with a link, I can add it here also. A Norwegian movie, might be just as crappy.. 

 

Actually from what I've heard, that one's not bad.

As to Troll 2, I think when the story was written they were meant to be goblins. Also factors in that while supposedly being a sequel, it doesn't seem to have much in common with the original movie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Actually from what I've heard, that one's not bad.

As to Troll 2, I think when the story was written they were meant to be goblins. Also factors in that while supposedly being a sequel, it doesn't seem to have much in common with the original movie.

Hm 7.0 on imdb. I just assumed it was bad. Had a memory of a cringe trailer.

Well, anyway. I think your trolls have more in common with the poster troll than mine. Feeding of other posters... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kass said:

Hm 7.0 on imdb. I just assumed it was bad. Had a memory of a cringe trailer.

Well, anyway. I think your trolls have more in common with the poster troll than mine. Feeding of other posters... 

Fair 😆

If you ever search "Troll 2" on YouTube, you'll find plenty of clips.

(with many of them having the word "worst" somewhere in their title)

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SOJA said:

the best troll of all time on this board was TheRealDeal or Matt Moore's brother 

I'm guessing several would nominate Alice for that particular...honor.

Probably need some clarification though. Guys like Alice, Real Deal and some of our resident Falcon fans are deliberate trolls. On the flipside, you've got guys that are just plain stupid.

Does being a dumbass really qualify as trolling? 🤔

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm guessing several would nominate Alice for that particular...honor.

Probably need some clarification though. Guys like Alice, Real Deal and some of our resident Falcon fans are deliberate trolls. On the flipside, you've got guys that are just plain stupid.

Does being a dumbass really qualify as trolling? 🤔

excellent counterpoint 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...