Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Aaron Rodgers to retire?

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

They have done a fair job of putting pieces around Arod. The RB position is always a ? They can never seem to quite figure out the WR position. They had a great D for years, lately, not so much. 

 

They did well with what they have. Stockholders. They never spend their Cap. They under pay anyone that let's them. And now they have lost the last great GB QB.

 

We'll see how they fare, now that they don't have a HOF QB.

They compete year in and year out. Period. They're aren't many organizations that Panthers fans can look at and laugh at. The Packers certainly aren't among them. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ladypanther said:

I heard that the annual stockholders' meeting is this coming week.  That one should be interesting.

Rogers is a narcissistic prick who has made sure he is the center of attention.  The losers are the GB fans. Those fans who fill the stadium in 20 below weather deserve better.

 

In the last 30 years. GB has had 2 QBs, both HOFers. Yet won a whopping 2 SBs. Not sure how they get the rep of being some great place to play?

 

As a lifelong Lions fan, I can tell you this. Brett was a much better foe than Rodgers. It's almost like Rodgers never got over the perceived draft snub. During weekly interviews he was snarky, and terse with opponents Press. 

 

A Detroit Free Press writer called him A-hole. He lost his job, but he was a hero around the Detroit area. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They compete year in and year out. Period. They're aren't many organizations that Panthers fans can look at and laugh at. The Packers certainly aren't among them. 

 

They have had 2 QBs in the last 30 years. Both HOFers. They should compete every year. Period. Hellz, one could argue they have underperformed considering.

 

Also, have you seen the Division they play in. People poo on the Division the Patriots play for them getting half their wins. But let's not use that against the vaunted Packers. 

 

Nobody said anything about laughing at anybody. Nice spin there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Fox007 Grand Master

Fox007

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

They compete year in and year out. Period. They're aren't many organizations that Panthers fans can look at and laugh at. The Packers certainly aren't among them. 

Yea everytime I come back here I'm reminded of just how much of a backwater for football discussion this place is lol. He then goes on to mention poo that the best organizations do...you know like...having only 2 QBs in the last 30 years. Only find that on the best teams.

Doing the same thing with Rodgers they did with Favre and now these yokels who only watch First Take just run with whatever they are told on there about how the Packers are "mismanaging" lol. Hell if anything the NFL will be more than willing to triple down to make sure the league doesn't end up like the NBA, much less a 1 ring having Diva of a QB from GB gonna be runnin poo. But honestly Rodgers hates the media and loves trolling them, so who knows.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

They have had 2 QBs in the last 30 years. Both HOFers. They should compete every year. Period. Hellz, one could argue they have underperformed considering.

 

Also, have you seen the Division they play in. People poo on the Division the Patriots play for them getting half their wins. But let's not use that against the vaunted Packers. 

 

Nobody said anything about laughing at anybody. Nice spin there.

The division they play in...

Vikings: 13 winning seasons since '95.

Bears: 8 winning seasons since '95

Lions: 7 winning seasons since '95

Reminder, the Panthers have 7 winning seasons since '95. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Yea everytime I come back here I'm reminded of just how much of a backwater for football discussion this place is lol. He then goes on to mention poo that the best organizations do...you know like...having only 2 QBs in the last 30 years. Only find that on the best teams.

Doing the same thing with Rodgers they did with Favre and now these yokels who only watch First Take just run with whatever they are told on there about how the Packers are "mismanaging" lol. Hell if anything the NFL will be more than willing to triple down to make sure the league doesn't end up like the NBA, much less a 1 ring having Diva of a QB from GB gonna be runnin poo. But honestly Rodgers hates the media and loves trolling them, so who knows.

 

We never even noticed you were gone.

 

Oh, and name me 1 team that has had only 2 QBs in the last 30 years that only won 2 Titles? C'mon Man. I'll wait.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, thunderraiden said:

Thats true, except that's not how it works in reality when a player takes a year off. After a whole season of Jordan Love they will be in a rock and hard place and a whole year out of football kinda proves the player is dead serious and irreconcilable. What do you hold him in spite with your new bride? Nope, they have to let him go or trade him for a 2nd round pick.

Lions did with Berry Sanders. Ricky Williams had the same situation as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The division they play in...

Vikings: 13 winning seasons since '95.

Bears: 8 winning seasons since '95

Lions: 7 winning seasons since '95

Reminder, the Panthers have 7 winning seasons since '95. 

 

Vikings: 13 losing seasons since '95

Bears: 18 losing seasons since '95

Lions: 19 losing seasons since '95

 

Packers: 21 winning seasons since '95. Yeah, lot's of competition.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Vikings: 13 losing seasons since '95

Bears: 18 losing seasons since '95

Lions: 19 losing seasons since '95

 

Packers: 21 winning seasons since '95. Yeah, lot's of competition.

 

I wish you had the self awareness to realize how much trash you talk indirectly about the Panthers while upholding yourself as the ultimate fan. You're basically insinuating that their division is trash while we would be tied for last in that division for winning seasons since our inception. We have the fewest in the NFC South too since it's inception in its current form in '02. 

Just not a whole lot of reflection going on before you throw shade at other organizations for having a history that shines a lot brighter than our own.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted

 

 

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I wish you had the self awareness to realize how much trash you talk indirectly about the Panthers while upholding yourself as the ultimate fan. You're basically insinuating that their division is trash while we would be tied for last in that division for winning seasons since our inception. We have the fewest in the NFC South too since it's inception in its current form in '02. 

Just not a whole lot of reflection going on before you throw shade at other organizations for having a history that shines a lot brighter than our own.

 

That's all well and good. Except we are talking about the Packers. You were the only one to bring up the Panthers. Damm dude, you really are bad at this aren't you?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...