Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Burns got that speed


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

If he can continue to bulk up while maintaining speed..smdh. A bullrush paired with that would almost be impossible to contain.

To think, I didn't want us to touch him because of Everrette Brown and his 1k spins. I wanted Sweat or Gary at the time iirc...glad I was wrong. Dude has swiftly became my favorite player on this defense since Luke left. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, ColumbusCounty said:

If he can continue to bulk up while maintaining speed..smdh. A bullrush paired with that would almost be impossible to contain.

To think, I didn't want us to touch him because of Everrette Brown and his 1k spins. I wanted Sweat or Gary at the time iirc...glad I was wrong. Dude has swiftly became my favorite player on this defense since Luke left. 

I wanted Sweat and absolutely did not want Gary. I thought Gary screamed bust. The measurables and production were just too far off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Peanut Butter said:

Posted at 5:30 like 53 his number.

Taken 16 overall .. 53 the 16th prime number

And, I will have to check my sources--he used to be 5 years old, and 3 years old, and 16 years old. 

This is getting weird.

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always wanted Burns. I don't really listen to critics. I listen to the ones who actually study the game. But the most important. I watch film. If u know what to look for. N if somethings jump off the tape. That's big upside. But when subconscious habits become natural movements n skills. It usually means there's a 75% chance he belongs in the NFL. Not the usual 50% n under. Then there's another level on rather or not he'll be able to be an all pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, MHS831 said:

And, I will have to check my sources--he used to be 5 years old, and 3 years old, and 16 years old. 

This is getting weird.

5  and 3 are 2 ages, and (5+3)*2=16. The proof becomes more decisive.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...