Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tremble Projected to be 3rd Most Productive Rookie TE

Little Goody Two Shoes
 Share

Recommended Posts

joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
20 hours ago, stbugs said:

You are expecting 1000 yards from the TE spot? Moore/Anderson are good for over 2k, probably 1500 for CMC and other WRs/RBs. 1000 yards at the TE spot means around 5000 yards passing for Darnold.

I think 1000 yards is way too optimistic.

I foresee Sam with 4200+ yards passing this year.  Hell, if Teddy were any kind of QB at all he would have had 4500 last season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, joemac said:

I hope there are packages with both Tremble and Arnold on the field at the same time.  I feel like Arnold could be used more like a 4th/5th WR, so that would give Tommy a spot next to one of the Tackles. 

Im a sanjay aka 2 TE nut, huge believer in that. I believe there will be some plays with both on the field and lots of movement. I want to control the middle of the field, TE do just that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
On 7/15/2021 at 5:17 PM, stbugs said:

You are expecting 1000 yards from the TE spot? Moore/Anderson are good for over 2k, probably 1500 for CMC and other WRs/RBs. 1000 yards at the TE spot means around 5000 yards passing for Darnold.

I think 1000 yards is way too optimistic.

 

Teddy threw for 3733 last year. Sam should be able to best that by a bit. I mean, if everything goes to plan anyway. But 4200+ yards seems doable.

 

I would think that if our zone running scheme works, we may not pass nearly as much as we may think. Not a huge numbers less, but not a throw the ball all over the yard Offense.

 

Sam's best friend would be a good ground game. Duh.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
On 7/13/2021 at 3:26 PM, L-TownCat said:

I’m not doubting ATLs new toy, but a top 5 pick on a TE?  That brings certain expectations.  Pitts will have to BALL to meet the initial demands.  
 

As mentioned Arnold is going to catch the passes and Tommyknocker is gonna help CMC make house calls and keep Sammy upright a little longer.

I still think you're wasting Pitts' skillset if you line him up as a TE (in-line). 

He's a big WR. Don't ask him to block LBs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

I still think you're wasting Pitts' skillset if you line him up as a TE (in-line). 

He's a big WR. Don't ask him to block LBs. 

He'll block about as much as Arnold will, here.  Not his primary responsibility but as a rookie he'll be expected to prove he can at least do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Aussie Tank
      What top 10 prospect do you absolutely NOT want?

      By Aussie Tank · Posted

      I don't get the Hunter hate. Just imagine his ceiling if he stopped trying to be this 2way freak and focused on one side of the ball 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Is running back on the table for the panthers this draft?

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      100%.  You have to play the cards that are dealt.  Not the cards you wish were dealt.
    • ColumbusCounty
      Is running back on the table for the panthers this draft?

      By ColumbusCounty · Posted

      I'd say its definitely going to be addressed this off-season.  We went into the last draft with a roster of RBs including:  Chubba, Blackshear, and Miles Sanders. We picked Jonathan Brooks in the second and still signed Rashaad Penny afterwards.  Fast forward....One turned into a top 10 back, 1 is injured/out for most if not all the '25 season, 1 retired, 1 will either take a huge paycut or be cut, and the last is a restricted free agent. We brought in Mike Boone as well. Add him to the free agent list also.  We need a physical option.    Which qualifies:  Ashton Jeanty(Boise St): Overall ranked Top 10. Almost 2k yards after contact, 28 tds. Would take our first rounder. My money would be on an NFC East team selecting him. (97.2 PFF run grade) - 121 forced missed tackles.  Omarion Hampton(UNC): Ranked everywhere from 20 - 59 overall. Consensus #2 back after Jeanty. He'll be a second rounder. 1,222 Yards after contact w/ 15 tds.  (90.5 PFF run grade) - 72 forced missed Tackles Kaleb Johnson(Iowa): Ranked from 38 - 69 depending on which media outlet you prefer but generally #3. 2nd/3rd possibly. 1,060 Yards after contact w/ 21 tds.(86.7 PFF run grade)- 66 forced missed tackles Cam Skattebo: Ranked from the 50's - 104. Every mock I do he ends up BPA at some point. 969 Yards after contact w/ 17 tds(92 PFF Run Grade). Probably the best receiving back of the group. 81 forced missed tackles.  If the '24 and '25 draft classes were combined, IMO the rankings would be, in order: Jeanty, Hampton, Brooks, Johnson, Skattebo. I wouldn't take one high but I'd take one for Chubba and Brooks insurance. 
×
×
  • Create New...