Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Safety Ha Ha Clinton-Dix to participate in Panthers minicamp on a tryout basis


vorbis
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, vorbis said:

it seems to me that the way Phil Snow works as far as players' positions is:

step one: find athletes

step two: get them on the field

step three: put them in position to make plays

step four: call the positions whatever

Sounds about right. These guys are going to have to get used to a lot of different jobs that fall outside the traditional roles for whatever position they are assigned, depending on situation.

Aside from the CBs (you've got 1 job), they better be ready for anything at any moment. 

I love that. And I love that (if things go as they should) you won't be able to tell anything from their formation or where the guys are lined up.

Base 4-3, but once that whistle blows it's anybody's guess 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, vorbis said:

it seems to me that the way Phil Snow works as far as players' positions is:

step one: find athletes

step two: get them on the field

step three: put them in position to make plays

step four: call the positions whatever

This is the way it should be, not the Rivera method of forcing square pegs into round holes because of "muh system".

  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Trainwreck said:

No difference? Okay you lost all the little credibility you did have. 

Fresh Prince Shrug GIF by MOODMAN

In many teams and systems, especially currently, there is very little difference between the two. Job responsibilities, expectations, and assignments all remain the same. 

The rise of the spread offense is the main reason for this. Both safeties have to be good in coverage and both have to be able to tackle the RB. 

Even in our defenses best years going back a 10-15 years or more, there was no difference in job responsibilities. You weren't a FS or a SS, you were just a safety.

And that's the way it is for a lot of teams going back into college. Many teams at the college level don't mess around with the designation. I mean they might assign one to the right side of the field and the other to the left, but it's got nothing to do with one guys job description being different than the others.

Ask the college game goes, so goes the pro game.... eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats hooker up to?? Ha-Ha is at that retirement fork, were teams are picking a 6th round rookie over you. 

Im alone on this branch, just feel the Safety spot is fine with or without Chinn. Big Burris and Franklin believer. Chandler and Krob got what you want in a safety as well, just need the coincidence form coaching staff. I like the group as a whole and think there no huge need there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Trainwreck said:

It’s sad that they only thing you have last is to be a grammar police. 

It's sad, that you seem to have such s lonely life, that you don't find anything better to do with your time, than try to annoy people you don't even know on the internet.

That's what's really sad

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Trainwreck said:

We better sign Haha. Dude is still very young and had a very good start of the season for GB before they traded him to Washington. 

Oh sure. It's always wise to sign a guy based on how good he was for part of a season three years ago.

We'll just ignore that he couldn't even make the final roster for the Cowboys (or anybody else) all of last year.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Agreed. A healthy bit from column A (stats) and column B (film) paints the most accurate picture, which is currently that Bryce is not performing up to the standard a 1st round QB (let alone drafted #1 overall) is expected to (statistically). When we dig into the film to see why, we see that while he's having his struggles (not stepping up in the pocket, bailing out early, hesitating on some throws, making occasional bad reads, etc) the team that surrounded him last season was simply awful. Bottom 5 defense, bottom 5 OL, bottom 5 weapons... but somehow one player has to overcome ALL of that in their rookie season? Yeesh... Taking this season into consideration, he started where he left off last season and was rightfully benched. Since starting again, the team has gotten on its first winning streak in a few years and he's made good plays to keep them in the game. Is he lighting it up? Nah... but he is beginning to show the reason so many draftniks had him as QB1a for his class. Re: what the team does next season... who friggin knows anymore at this point T_T. Resign Dalton? Sign Jones? Draft somebody in the mid-to-late rounds? Go with another UFA? Maybe grab an FA that can compete with Bryce for the starting position and draft a rookie to sit and develop? Might be best of both worlds for the team, but ugh... not a fun position to still be in with question marks throughout the position group.
    • Yeah, this is basically the same as asking, "What if Bryce Young suddenly had Patrick Mahomes brain, how would he do?" It isn't happening. This ship is beyond sailed. Send him somewhere else, let us move on and him move on. 
    • Dalton is too close to starting right now. If it hadn't been for a car accident, he still would be. Switching Dalton for Jones does nothing except reduce the backup's age by a decade. One is in his NFL prime, the other is almost in his NFL grave. Not a horrible move if you're trying to improve the team. We've got to get better as a team and a lateral move like that would improve the team. The problem isn't that he's close to starting. The problem is we have a GM that signed off on BY and didn't bring in any serious QB competition for camp, a HC that said yeah, he's my guy until BY poo the bed so bad he couldn't start him, and an offense that's limited because BY can't make all the throws a normal NFL QB can.  The problem isn't that Jones could be an improvement as a backup QB. The problem is he could be better than our "franchise" QB. 
×
×
  • Create New...