Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Phil Snow Press Conference

SBBlue

By SBBlue,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Stop responding to him. 

Seriously.  

 

It always amazes me how many people think they can either. 1. Out Troll a Troll, or 2. Reason with a Troll. lol

 

We can say "Don't feed the Trolls", until you're blue in the face. Yet, folks still do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, CanadianCat said:

I got sucked in.. 

 

lol   No problem at all. Just needed to get that off my chest. BUT...now you know better. Right? Don't make me have to chastise you again. Mkay?

 

Always remember, "I must not tell lies". No wait. "I must not feed the Trolls." 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBBlue Veteran

SBBlue

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

lol   No problem at all. Just needed to get that off my chest. BUT...now you know better. Right? Don't make me have to chastise you again. Mkay?

 

Always remember, "I must not tell lies". No wait. "I must not feed the Trolls." 

I'm probably never going to learn.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

It always amazes me how many people think they can either. 1. Out Troll a Troll, or 2. Reason with a Troll. lol

 

We can say "Don't feed the Trolls", until you're blue in the face. Yet, folks still do it.

Never argue with an idiot. 

1st, ya have to lower yourself to do so. 

Even if you win, you're still retarded. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBBlue Veteran

SBBlue

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

I just had to remind you in the "Shaq" thread. That's two. One more and there will be consequences. Severe consequences I tell ya what.

You know, I spent a little time in the tinderbox yesterday...some threads got moved there.

I think I found the trolls' hidden base.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBBlue Veteran

SBBlue

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
On 6/10/2021 at 6:44 AM, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I think what makes me happy about this defense is when he said he would have to figure out a way to get all the talent we have on the field.   This tells me that the players we have are good enough to play and most will see playing time.  

IMO he's saying our depth is outstanding. 

If Taylor is a legitimate 2-3r rounder and Pride leverages that speed to take a step up, when AJ returns game 3, we have depth in the secondary.   On the D line, Burns, Fox, Haynes, Roy, Nixon, Brown, Jones, Gross-Matos are all there.   They're not all the same level, but it doesn't appear to have the drop off like years past.  

We did the same thing this year on with the oline, TE, and WR unit.  There appears to a real focus on depth, rather than looking for stars this year.

 

Edited by SBBlue
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBBlue Veteran

SBBlue

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 6/10/2021 at 4:49 PM, CanadianCat said:

holy fugg... stay out of there!!

Went back in today.  Kicked the nest and ran out.    I couldn't help myself, they were attacking our QB.  One called him Mono Man.   Some fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted (edited)

In reviewing stats yesterday looking at points for and points against for us and others in the division I noticed the obvious and perhaps the not so obvious.  Obviously you have to score more than you give up and in most every category our defense gave up.more than we produced. So obviously the problem was the offense right? Given we don't play our offense against our defense but other teams defense then how does our offense compare to others teams defenses and you see the issue. NO and TB both has top 10 defenses.  Of course they had top 10 offenses as well. While Atlanta is supposedly bad on defense, points wise they were right next to us.  So how many points can we realistic expect to give up and still win? Obviously the answer is we need to score 1 more point than they score. But given the defenses in our division and on our schedule can we afford to give up 25 points a game and stand a good chance of winning?  Can our offense consistent put up 27 points a game?  Should they have to? I have always said my goal for the team is don't give up more than 21 points and you should be in most games. That would have put up top 5 last year. NO gave up 20.9 and Tampa gave up 21.6 and were both top 10. So while we want our offense to be prolific and score 30 points a game is that realistic? And given that Tampa and NO score 30 points a game on offense and Atlanta scored close to 25 points is it realistic to assume we can hold them to way below their season average. And yes I know Brees retired but I am not writing them off until I see them suck.

I keep seeing the discussion about how we were on both sides of the ball compared to other defenses or offenses on the same side of the ball but wanted to change the conversation to how will our defense compare to the offenses and vice versa.

Edited by panthers55
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Martin
      Why I Believe That We Will Trade Down

      By Martin · Posted

      I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • MHS831
      General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread

      By MHS831 · Posted

      After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...