Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stanley Cup Playoffs: Round Two, Game 4


Harbingers
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

The entire team played like hot garbage for 50 out of 60 minutes in this game. No way they win another game in this series. They’re not a bad team but they completely folded against the Lightning and had no answer for their attack and power play.

Yeah our PP has become nothing and our discipline isn't there anymore either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Still going to pull for a miracle but I would have bet the house on a canes win if you told me we scored 4 prior to the game.

Even the diehard optimists have to see this series is as good as over unless the lightning bench their top line for 3 games and Mrazek is cut from the roster

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Mrazek wont see the ice again.... Have a feeling we take game five and bow out in 6.

Eh maybe, if they stay out of the box. Tampa is so deadly on the PP I just can’t see them winning another game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

Mrazek wont see the ice again.... Have a feeling we take game five and bow out in 6.

Agreed. We will circle circle wagons in the next game and lose in Tampa.

It was a great season and it is a shame to see it all be for naught. Glad we are a young team, though. 

It will be interesting to see how we look next year without some guys(Mrazek, Dougie, etc).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Agreed. We will circle circle wagons in the next game and lose in Tampa.

It was a great season and it is a shame to see it all be for naught. Glad we are a young team, though. 

It will be interesting to see how we look next year without some guys(Mrazek, Dougie, etc).

This game is going to sting for while, taking a two goal lead and then Mrazek letting in four strait goals between saves was brutal. I think you let them both walk and spend the money elswhere.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

This game is going to sting for while, taking a two goal lead and then Mrazek letting in four strait goals between saves was brutal. I think you let them both walk and spend the money elswhere.

Agreed. That is a lot of free money to help us improve. Ned is clearly the future and Dougie is awesome but was just never the same player after that leg injury.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Agreed. We will circle circle wagons in the next game and lose in Tampa.

It was a great season and it is a shame to see it all be for naught. Glad we are a young team, though. 

It will be interesting to see how we look next year without some guys(Mrazek, Dougie, etc).

Hoping for someway to get Lehner and then we need another top defenseman that is more defense oriented than offense. I've never liked Offensive Defensemen that much. Only a few.

Edited by KillerKat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

Hoping for someway to get Lehner and then we need another top defenseman that is more defense oriented than offense. I've never liked Offensive Defensemen that much. Only a few.

Haha yea there aren’t guys like Paul Coffey or Al MacInnis anymore 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Snake said:

What a wasted season. Smh.

Yep. Seems to be a trend under Rod. I love the guy but this is slowly becoming like the Bengals with Marvin Lewis. 
Great season that gives the fanbase hope until the playoffs and we choke or are outmatched. 
You are right this season was a waste. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...