Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much of the Jets performance was really on Darnold?


SBBlue
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:

 

So it's really as simple as a coin flip?

There's no proper framework/precedent you can think of which could allow for an evaluation process that might tilt the odds in the favor of Tepper & Co??

Huh?  People have listed rebounds on the thread....you'll just dismiss it.

Even so, is one example enough?   You really need a dozen to make a case.   Small.  Data. Set.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SBBlue said:

Huh?  People have listed rebounds on the thread....you'll just dismiss it.

Even so, is one example enough?   You really need a dozen to make a case.   Small.  Data. Set.  

 

FYI Sizzle is a troll. You can answer his questions with data and examples and he will just keep adding to it or changing it to keep his trolling alive. It’s a waste of time to engage. Remember Don’t Feed The Trolls.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SizzleBuzz said:


No doubt, very very "small"...

How about some specifics on Sam?  

Apparently he can "sling it"...

...what else?

TBH I really don't know much about Darnold.  I don't watch jets games...and don't intend to, except the coming week1.    I've seen the lowlights and the highlights.    But here's one rather even handed eval:

 

Let me know what you think.

 

Edited by SBBlue
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

FYI Sizzle is a troll. You can answer his questions with data and examples and he will just keep adding to it or changing it to keep his trolling alive. It’s a waste of time to engage. Remember Don’t Feed The Trolls.

Hey thanks.   I  know.   I learned some from other peoples posted replies to this troll.    I'm just going to post a few more.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know for a FACT what my eyes have witnessed & more often than not unfortunately especially if you are a fan of the Panthers like myself it's not pretty to say the least 

but on the other hand i have to dismiss what I know to be the truth & still yet hope for the best...

with that said go Panthers

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bandu said:

i know for a FACT what my eyes have witnessed & more often than not unfortunately especially if you are a fan of the Panthers like myself it's not pretty to say the least 

but on the other hand i have to dismiss what I know to be the truth & still yet hope for the best...

with that said go Panthers

I'm just wondering what you think if of the video I posted couple posts before  here:

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The coaches have shown confidence in Sam, he looks happy and confident....everything else like message board chatter is just noise.  The Panthers organization has already shown they believe in him, rest is up to him.  

Happy Birthday today, Sammy.  Fight On!

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I’d say a lot. Darnold is a huge gamble, I think his ceiling is a delhomme style. But I also don’t know if this coaching staff has the experience to even get him up to that level. 

I think Delhomme is about right as far as his ceiling. He will never be an elite franchise QB but if everything goes his way he might be able to be as good as Delhomme was.

His ceiling is honestly less concerning than his floor.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think Delhomme is about right as far as his ceiling. He will never be an elite franchise QB but if everything goes his way he might be able to be as good as Delhomme was.

His ceiling is honestly less concerning than his floor.

Agreed. I really hope this coaching staff can work some magic. I love me some canes but I’d really like to see the panthers take a step in the right direction. I know most folks here saw last year as a step forward but I think it was a wash comparable to the previous season, guess I’m just a little more cynical. I just didn’t see as much forward momentum but I am giving everyone but Snow a pass. Especially now that we finally rid ourselves of Hernia. I just don’t think Snow is gonna be capable of out scheming most OC’s in the league. Luke leaving tells me a lot too, if he thought this team could make it to a superb owl he would still be here. 
 

Back on subject though, I think Darnold will be more fun to watch, which is what most people want, I think Rhule is capable of preparing him mentally, but I’m not sure about the staying power Rhule has and I’m not sure the locker room is buying into his coaching style.
 

I hate to say it but I’d still firmly place my bet on a chip Kelly-esque situation happening here. I think Rhule will get these players prepared but I think Tepper will bring in a Vet coach to get them over the hump. Here’s to hoping I’m wrong though and Rhule turns out to be a mad genius. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

Agreed. I really hope this coaching staff can work some magic. I love me some canes but I’d really like to see the panthers take a step in the right direction. I know most folks here saw last year as a step forward but I think it was a wash comparable to the previous season, guess I’m just a little more cynical. I just didn’t see as much forward momentum but I am giving everyone but Snow a pass. Especially now that we finally rid ourselves of Hernia. I just don’t think Snow is gonna be capable of out scheming most OC’s in the league. Luke leaving tells me a lot too, if he thought this team could make it to a superb owl he would still be here. 
 

Back on subject though, I think Darnold will be more fun to watch, which is what most people want, I think Rhule is capable of preparing him mentally, but I’m not sure about the staying power Rhule has and I’m not sure the locker room is buying into his coaching style.
 

I hate to say it but I’d still firmly place my bet on a chip Kelly-esque situation happening here. I think Rhule will get these players prepared but I think Tepper will bring in a Vet coach to get them over the hump. Here’s to hoping I’m wrong though and Rhule turns out to be a mad genius. 

Yeah, we are betting on long shots in the all college staff and a reclamation bust QB. 

You just have to hope that one or more of the gambles works. I guess ultimately that is all you need. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, we are betting on long shots in the all college staff and a reclamation bust QB. 

You just have to hope that one or more of the gambles works. I guess ultimately that is all you need. 

I mean gambling is what made tepper a billionaire so… he knows more than I, that’s for sure. But I’m not sold on this gamble. I will however enjoy every minute of it. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Harbingers said:

I’d say a lot. Darnold is a huge gamble, I think his ceiling is a delhomme style. But I also don’t know if this coaching staff has the experience to even get him up to that level. 

We got Jake at 28, so let's say Darnold takes a year to get ramped up and hits his stride in 2022 at 24 years old. I wouldn't mind four additional years (younger years vs. older years) of a Delhomme-esque QB with the weapons we have around him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • True.  Sam and Baker did not do well here but went on to better things under better coaching, circumstances or both.  The real question is, ‘why aren’t the Panthers able to get improved performance out of ‘broken toys’, similar to Minnesota and Tampa? That is a rhetorical question.  I think we know the answer.   [The cultural reference to Pogo dates me, I admit.]
    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of mature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.  Just so you know, I critique and perform research in my job.  I am often amazed at how the numbers do not support my suppositions.  I learned that my impression is often wrong until I look at the data.  In this case, I have considered all the important variables and he should get a shot.  Numbers don't lie--and when you and others resort to twisted name calling directed toward the poster--it verifies my position.  
    • I don’t get this, I know that is the popular thought process but I just don’t think it’s true.  For instance head to head last year the ACC had a winning record against the SEC.  The SEC had a losing record in bowl games. This year so far the head to head is 2-3 SEC and that’s with a fluke Vandy win in week one.  I see the ACC taking another head to head winning season after next week.  The SEC is mostly hype with 3 good teams, in my opinion.  But to say any ACC team would get exposed I believe is a stretch 
×
×
  • Create New...