Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold's "Style of Ball"

CarolinaLivin

By CarolinaLivin,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

 

So what are you implying?

That a Panthers fan's point of view on a Messageboard is correct(and True) and EVERYONE ELSE actually closely involved with the Team is wrong and false?

Come on, CRA.... That is a ridiculous take and you know it.  smh.

 

Just what I said, reports aren't the gospel.   Lot of times teams want certain things out there.  They will put it out there.   Pretty common in sports.  People use the media.  Teams.  Players.  

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Darnold was definitely not our first or second choice. Fitts being in on every deal is why we were talking to the Jets early. (Which we thought a second was too much for him originally) I’m sure he has spoke with half of the teams about potential trade targets. I’m feeling a little optimistic about Darnold, but I’m not delusional in thinking we wanted him first the whole time. 

Not quite correct. They didn't discuss terms in the initial contact because the Jets wanted to wait. Had they not, the deal might have happened then.

Breer did confirm elsewhere that once the Jets started talking, they suggested a swap of first round picks. The Panthers did balk at that suggestion because at that point, they didn't want to give up the 8th pick.

There were other discussions, and other options, but the Panthers ultimately decided Darnold was their best option.

So not first, but not last. "Second tier" might be the most accurate description.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I just didn't take it for the gospel you did. There was waaaaaay too much talk about a pending Watson trade for there to be no smoke. You just cling desperately to sources that confirm your take. Those are "reports". Everything else is "rumors". That's called "confirmation bias". We all have it, you're just completely blind to yours.

Just like there was "way too much talk" about Justin Fields?

There was a whole bunch of rumor that turned out to be nothing, but cling to that if it makes you feel better.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenwo2 Grand Master

glenwo2

Posted
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, CRA said:

Just what I said, reports aren't the gospel.   Lot of times teams want certain things out there.  They will put it out there.   Pretty common in sports.  People use the media.  Teams.  Players.  

 

Neither are fans' opinions on a messageboard.    🤨

But actual team reports are more legit than just opinions so that's why they are taken more seriously than anything posted here.

Edited by glenwo2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SBBlue Veteran

SBBlue

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

People that do this are pretty arrogant, that's for sure.

 

That's a fair point.  Even myself who is strongly rooting for Sam to succeed knows that he was Plan C (after Stafford, and Watson).    No big deal.  

 

So what are you implying?

That a Panthers fan's point of view on a Messageboard is correct(and True) and EVERYONE ELSE actually closely involved with the Team is wrong and false?

Come on, CRA.... That is a ridiculous take and you know it.  smh.

 

So I read the article.  Great post by the way.  The Stafford trade went down in January.  We contacted the jets in February. 

It looks like Stafford was the first pitch, but obviously we were way too low... since they got Goff, a third rounder and two first round picks.

When I heard about our offer, I thought there is no way the Lions were going to take that.   Are you saying we knew it would be too low, we were headfaking the jets to say...hey there's plenty of fish in the sea if you don't want to dance?  There may be an element of that....but it sounds a bit of stretch.  I'm not sure why we took the time to lowball Stafford.  But Teddy and a first (even at 8th) just didn't sound like enough me.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Just like there was "way too much talk" about Justin Fields?

There was a whole bunch of rumor that turned out to be nothing, but cling to that if it makes you feel better.

The reports said the room was divided. There were people in the organization who wanted Fields. Some felt he was a generational talent. The pro-Darnold faction won out.

But, everything is always black and white with you. "Black" being your take and "white" being literally anything to the contrary.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not quite correct. They didn't discuss terms in the initial contact because the Jets wanted to wait. Had they not, the deal might have happened then.

Breer did confirm elsewhere that once the Jets started talking, they suggested a swap of first round picks. The Panthers did balk at that suggestion because at that point, they didn't want to give up the 8th pick.

There were other discussions, and other options, but the Panthers ultimately decided Darnold was their best option.

So not first, but not last. "Second tier" might be the most accurate description.

How can you possibly know it wasn’t the last? We didn’t offer anyone else afterwards so it technically was last, but no one else good was really available...  Your guy Albert Breer who we are suppose to 100% believe in this story was helping push the we might draft a QB story as well. I doubt any of us will know the whole story. I’m not taking one side other than he clearly wasn’t our first. But we should we sit here and believe one journalist and write off another sometimes same journalist article?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.si.com/.amp/nfl/2021/04/12/carolina-panthers-sam-darnold-quarterback-nfl-draft

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Just like there was "way too much talk" about Justin Fields?

There was a whole bunch of rumor that turned out to be nothing, but cling to that if it makes you feel better.

go to the Panther confidential thread and tell me what the last name on the board looks like.  I mean, if you had to guess.   

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, SBBlue said:

So I read the article.  Great post by the way.  The Stafford trade went down in January.  We contacted the jets in February. 

It looks like Stafford was the first pitch, but obviously we were way too low... since they got Goff, a third rounder and two first round picks.

When I heard about our offer, I thought there is no way the Lions were going to take that.   Are you saying we knew it would be too low, we were headfaking the jets to say...hey there's plenty of fish in the sea if you don't want to dance?  There may be an element of that....but it sounds a bit of stretch.  I'm not sure why we took the time to lowball Stafford.  But Teddy and a first (even at 8th) just didn't sound like enough me.  

 

I don't see it as a low-ball, it's just what we were willing to offer. We were probably hoping the Niners would low-ball. Honestly, we were always a long shot to land Stafford. To their credit, the Lions actually wanted to do right by him after botching it with Barry Sanders and Megatron. Objectively, the Niners are just a much better situation than we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, CRA said:

go the Panther confidential thread and tell me what the last name on the board looks like.  I mean, if you had to guess.   

 

That doesn't fit the narrative. Therefore, it's a rumor. Didn't you read the "report"? Delusional.

Did you know that Sam Darnold is "basically a rookie"? I mean, that's the "report".

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • mav1234
      Gameday Thread: KC-CAR

      By mav1234 · Posted

      KC has a very good defense this year. It is 5th overall. Yes, still worse than last year, but their offense is considerably worse. Their passing D may be their "weakness" but they still allow fewer than 20 ppg. BY completed several deep passes yesterday, and he was able to threaten downfield in ways he didn't seem capable of before the benching. I'm not necessarily worried about his ability to connect deep anymore. What to me was impressive was that he did all this without a run game. We used the pass to set up what little running success we had. Wild.
    • Bear Hands
      Bryce developing before our eyes

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Solid and fair assessment.   I will say, one of the big things I noticed yesterday was that he wasn't shy to step up into the pocket in the face of pressure.  He's trusting the IOL.  And they took care of Chris Jones yesterday.  We had clean pockets but also good success rate vs. pressure which just hasn't been the case with Bryce.   If he has more confidence the OL gets it done and he can navigate and step up for throws, that's huge.  It's one of the biggest things that's held him back.  He was previously bailing quickly and just too easily throwing away or making dead plays.     He was finding his 2nd to 3rd reads within structure/without bailing in the pocket.  That was nice to see, as much concern I have with him.  And the overall limitations will always be there. Time to back it up this week against the Bucs.  
    • 45catfan
      Some Thoughts on Our Remaining Games

      By 45catfan · Posted

      Suddenly the Cowgirls look like our best chance for a win remaining. I think the Bucs are playing better than the Falcons of late.  Our lone game versus the dirty birds is in the ATL where we always struggle.  The Cardinals are marginally better than I thought they would be. We are not beating the Eagles, they are starting to roll. I'm saying two at most, next week at home versus the Bucs and the Cowgirls.
×
×
  • Create New...