Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Success


BrianS
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

I think with Trevor and Fields you have two very highly recruited High School QBs that fully lived up to expectations in college and had multiple years of success against top teams. Throw in their arm talent and intelligence and they seem like safer picks than most IMO. 

IMO, in terms of pure arm talent, this class goes:

Wilson

Fields

 

 

Lawrence

 

 

 

 

Jones 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trask

Don't get me wrong, Lawrence has a good arm and it's not a red flag in the least, but Wilson and Fields both have very good arms.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

IMO, in terms of pure arm talent, this class goes:

Wilson

Fields

 

 

Lawrence

 

 

 

 

Jones 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trask

Don't get me wrong, Lawrence has a good arm and it's not a red flag in the least, but Wilson and Fields both have very good arms.

 

Trevor is more like a QB robot.  Kinda like Peyton Manning if you gave him some decent wheels.   Not saying that is what he will be, but that kinda is the mold.  Easily the highest floor of the group. 

Zach Wilson has a crazy arm.  No doubt.  I think he probably will make some of the worst decisions with the ball though if ranked with that group. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

IMO, in terms of pure arm talent, this class goes:

Wilson

Fields

 

 

Lawrence

 

 

 

 

Jones 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trask

Don't get me wrong, Lawrence has a good arm and it's not a red flag in the least, but Wilson and Fields both have very good arms.

 

Yeah, but to me Wilson only had one year of great success, weaker competition, and an injury to his throwing shoulder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Trey Lance is gonna be the best qb from this draft class. Especially going to that 49ers team with Shanahan. Arguably the best spot he could’ve landed in. A lot of this stuff has to do with situations the qbs are drafted.
 

I honestly expect an Andrew luck in Indy situation with Lawrence. I think he retires early. I think Wilson is gonna bust but only because of the Jets org. It’s a toss up with fields. That bears org cannot develop qbs and have terrible offenses but I think he’s special. Maybe a cam type situation there plays out. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

You know I was just thinking about this.  Unitas (My Hero when I was young) was from Louisville and one of the greatest.  Great point about Staubach. 

Schools make no difference.  There isn't a QB University.

Thanks for posting this.  

IIRC Unitas was cut by the Steelers and was on a semi-pro team when Baltimore got him

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheRumGone said:

I think Trey Lance is gonna be the best qb from this draft class. Especially going to that 49ers team with Shanahan. Arguably the best spot he could’ve landed in. A lot of this stuff has to do with situations the qbs are drafted.
 

I honestly expect an Andrew luck in Indy situation with Lawrence. I think he retires early. I think Wilson is gonna bust but only because of the Jets org. It’s a toss up with fields. That bears org cannot develop qbs and have terrible offenses but I think he’s special. Maybe a cam type situation there plays out. 

I mean, you toss Lance and Fields out there day 1.....and there teams will have more wins than Trevor's team this season.  No doubt about that.  Both those teams can push .500 with basically getting little from the QB spot.  

I don't think you can judge a QB by that.  I fully expect Lawrence and Wilson to have loosing seasons and a lot of picks.  There teams will be playing from behind and they don't have the weapons to make that easy on a young QB.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, you toss Lance and Fields out there day 1.....and there teams will have more wins than Trevor's team this season.  No doubt about that.  Both those teams can push .500 with basically getting little from the QB spot.  

I don't think you can judge a QB by that.  I fully expect Lawrence and Wilson to have loosing seasons and a lot of picks.  There teams will be playing from behind and they don't have the weapons to make that easy on a young QB.  

That’s basically what I was saying about depends on where you land. But I think Lance is going to end up being the best of the bunch long term. But that’s just my guess doesn’t mean anything.

I think Trevor enjoys football but doesn’t love it. I see him exiting early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

That’s basically what I was saying about depends on where you land. But I think Lance is going to end up being the best of the bunch long term. But that’s just my guess doesn’t mean anything.

I think Trevor enjoys football but doesn’t love it. I see him exiting early.

I agree that there will be a lot more Lucks and Lukes going forward.  High draft picks that get that first big contract.....and decide the smart move is not trash your body by maxing it out in the NFL. 

My money has is still on Trevor and Fields out of this draft.   I've never really bought in on the rest of them.  They all have bigger question marks to me.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Little Goody Two Shoes said:

Or does this just make it easier to evaluate those who come from a 'pro' system? Just because they didn't do it in college, doesn't mean they can't. Yes, they may have an advantage getting acclimated but it ultimately comes down to the player's ability.

Fields is a little different in my opinion because the 3 qb’s before him all looked like heisman finalists in that system and flamed out atrociously in the nfl.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

Fields is a little different in my opinion because the 3 qb’s before him all looked like heisman finalists in that system and flamed out atrociously in the nfl.  

Jones and Barnett were highly criticized about their passing ability while in college though.   Just like some of Urban's FL boys.  Nice stats.  Wins.  But not good passers. 

That was never Fields.  Who outplayed Lawrence twice head to head in the college playoffs and probably the most accurate QB in this draft. 

Haskins was a good passer.  Not a runner like everyone else. But only had 1 college season to name and then went to a NFL team whose coaches (2) didn't want him.   But the little we saw of him wasn't good at all.  But talk about a bad landing. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is a backwards way to look at it though.   Some systems and teams are notorious for making average qbs look above average.  That has to be factored in as well.  Maybe which colleges produced the most highly touted prospects coming out of college that ended up being busts.  Any college can randomly hit on a good qb eventually.   The question is do some college routinely make their qb look better than they will be at the next level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Watching Rams/Eagles. Celebrating the St Louis Rams team that won the SB (Warner, Holt, etc..) while playing in Los Angeles seems wrong.  If I were in Los Angeles, no way I would attend a Rams game.  Probably wouldn't attend a Chargers game either.  Becoming a fan of a team that likes to move around just seems like a waste of energy as a fan.  
    • The only responses I am getting after providing statistics to put opinions in perspective seem to be from people who get angry and attack stats and people whose opinions differ from their own.  Have people on the Huddle ever overreacted, exaggerated, been wrong about players before?  Sure they have, so an alternative opinion with statistical support should not cause you to attack me or my views.  I am sorry your public schools failed you.  But your reactions are very revealing--you are stuck in Piaget's concrete operational stage--learn logic, how to debate a topic, and learn the difference between facts and emotional opinions.  When I paralleled Cam's stats with Jones' to point out how remarkably similar their careers have been to this point, It blew some 40 watt minds.  I think Jones, in a better situation, could be good--that should not upset you--
    • penalties and poor hands is what cost us in the RZ Bryce missing "high" in the back of the end zone is not an issue, you're taught as a QB to throw high in the back of end zone were only the receiver can catch or no one The duo of Ian Thomas and Tommy tremble can both go at the end of the season, both been here for multiple seasons and they've barely developed
×
×
  • Create New...