Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looks like Watson will settle lawsuits


Ja  Rhule
 Share

Recommended Posts

Was there ever any real doubt this would all be concluded with a settlement? They should have just skipped to this part and gotten it over with. If he actually did anything wrong hopefully he learned next time he needs a massage with a happy ending to just go one of those shady neon sign light on legit jack shacks to keep things simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Snake said:

Pretty much called this. Innocent or guilty its just easier to pay them off.

Yeah and it's pretty fuged up regardless. If he's innocent it's fuged up that he's essentially forced to pay because the alternative of fighting it is a long process with no guarantees that he'll actually be found innocent as it's a he said she said case. And if he's guilty it's fuged up that these victims would just accept money to let him walk free. fuged up all around.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, t96 said:

Yeah and it's pretty fuged up regardless. If he's innocent it's fuged up that he's essentially forced to pay because the alternative of fighting it is a long process with no guarantees that he'll actually be found innocent as it's a he said she said case. And if he's guilty it's fuged up that these victims would just accept money to let him walk free. fuged up all around.

Pretty much how it goes this day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, t96 said:

Yeah and it's pretty fuged up regardless. If he's innocent it's fuged up that he's essentially forced to pay because the alternative of fighting it is a long process with no guarantees that he'll actually be found innocent as it's a he said she said case. And if he's guilty it's fuged up that these victims would just accept money to let him walk free. fuged up all around.

IMO, If they accept money and none of them say "I don't want no stinking settlement", it just proves that they were all lying out of their ass in order to get paid.  

 

Edited by glenwo2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm....I take it mrcompletely11 didn't like that take of mine.   🤔

Perhaps he'd like to tell me in his own words why he didn't like it instead of just lurking and reacting....  Just saying...

I mean...since they were victims in this, they should NEVER accept settlements if Watson did this crap to them.  They should've gone after him since he committed a Criminal act to them.  

Sorry, but It's difficult to be sympathetic to them if they just took the money. 

Plus, it makes them look less believable that they were victims and more that they were looking to cash in on a high-profile Highly-Paid Professional Sports Athlete.

It is what it is.

Edited by glenwo2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

Hmm....I take it mrcompletely11 didn't like that take of mine.   🤔

Perhaps he'd like to tell me in his own words why he didn't like it instead of just lurking and reacting....  Just saying...

I mean...since they were victims in this, they should NEVER accept settlements if Watson did this crap to them.  They should've gone after him since he committed a Criminal act to them.  

Sorry, but It's difficult to be sympathetic to them if they just took the money. 

Plus, it makes them look less believable that they were victims and more that they were looking to cash in on a high-profile Highly-Paid Professional Sports Athlete.

It is what it is.


Maybe they just want Watson to acknowledge what he did and this settlement includes that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom lines to me are that a) we played well enough to beat the best team in the league and b) Bryce Young is growing into a bridge QB role (his ceiling) for us. As much as I don't want BY around after the season, it seems DC can still build the O with a game manager at QB for now. Best case scanario, we can build the D through the draft this year and take a QB we have conviction outside the 1st this or next draft. If BY keeps improving, we are going to win a couple more games this year.
    • Bryce has been a completely different QB since coming back. That started in Denver where it was obviously he was playing a lot more loose and willing to push the ball downfield  Bryce continues to build off of the previous weeks performance and that’s what you want to see Bryce has been making some real good anticipation throws. Reading defenses well. Pushing the ball downfield (7 throws of 20+ air yards yesterday. 8 if you want to include PI to Thielen). The deep ball accuracy has been there. Some of Young’s best throws yesterday were incompletions. Sideline balls to XL and Moore both should’ve been caught. RZ dot to Tremble should’ve been caught. And another RZ ball to Moore that Young gave him a chance at. Bryce is starting to execute Canales offense and yesterday Canales finally opened it up a bit. Canales was to blame for the 126 passing yards in Germany as he played a more conservative game.  The next bit I’m looking for his for Young to be a bit more decisive with running the ball. Start putting that on film and it’ll help open things up a tad
    • This KC team isn't the juggernaut it once was.  How many one score games have they won this season?  How many of those one score wins would probably have been loses if Mahomes wasn't the QB?  Their secondary is vulnerable and it was obvious today.  Grandpa Thielen was able to get open at will all game long. Bryce played well, but thinking this is the exact same KC defense Young was able to move the ball against as last year isn't going to compute.  Last year's KC defense was #2 overall.  They have regressed. I've said it before, Bryce can move the ball before the red zone, but once there, he struggles.  He is not a threat with his legs and the passing windows get much tighter.  He's not turning the ball over, so that is a great place to start and build upon.  I still question much better he can get.  Beyond a game manager?  I highly doubt it.
×
×
  • Create New...