Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Teddy Opens up About Carolina (CBS)

CarolinaLivin

By CarolinaLivin,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted

To me Teddy was still playing like a backup. Quick passes and check down passes to try to not lose the game. Solidified starters have to take risks and trust their teammates to do their jobs. His arm being somewhat limited is part of it, but part of it is the mental aspect of trying to play it safe. Later in the season we had nothing to lose (were out of the playoff race) and he still kept it dialed in during the 4th quarter when we were down. Unless he can change his mindset he will always be a great backup and below average starter.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MechaZain Veteran

MechaZain

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Moo Daeng said:

The reaction to this is interesting. Fans rip coaches and players constantly but with little understanding of the situation. Over and over we said the red zone offense sucked. Teddy played a part in that but why couldn't the OC with zero experience as an OC have some things he's not good at yet? Maybe there is something to learn from this.

Teddy was answering a question and did it respectfully and professionally. If this had been in reference to Shula or the Turners or Rivera this could be applauded.  I see on the One Panther Place Twitter where our very own ellis is saying he should be focused on Denver. Why is Bridgewater not allowed to answer questions and need to move on while the Twitter account in question gets to spend a whole day plus making content over it? This account dwells on a lot of things much older but I guess only media can do that? By the way I check that account every day and appreciate the content as it just about the only independent thing left. I don't agree with every point there but that's fine.

Players make a lot of money and I suppose this comes with the territory but the personal attacks and wishes for broken legs because of this are pathetic.

Huge difference between a fan criticizing and an integral part of the failure making the same criticism. A 6th year QB who can't hit a open guy directly in front of him and fumbles on the goal line trying to improv frankly has no authority to speak on how the coaches should handle redzone situations. He's an unprofessional loser who has a lot to say about everyone but himself when things go wrong.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BigTeddyFan Rookie

BigTeddyFan

Posted
Posted

This provides further evidence that the problem lies with Rhule and Brady, and they should have been shown the door and the team built around Teddy.

He didn’t earn the nickname “Teddy Icewater” for nothing. I expect great things from him in Denver behind his wisdom and leadership, especially in crunch time.

  • Flames 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaLivin Veteran

CarolinaLivin

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, BigTeddyFan said:

This provides further evidence that the problem lies with Rhule and Brady, and they should have been shown the door and the team built around Teddy.

He didn’t earn the nickname “Teddy Icewater” for nothing. I expect great things from him in Denver behind his wisdom and leadership, especially in crunch time.

Question, how many drinks do you consume in a day?

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ocpanthertew714 Veteran

Ocpanthertew714

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, BigTeddyFan said:

This provides further evidence that the problem lies with Rhule and Brady, and they should have been shown the door and the team built around Teddy.

He didn’t earn the nickname “Teddy Icewater” for nothing. I expect great things from him in Denver behind his wisdom and leadership, especially in crunch time.

clown GIF by Team Coco

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPcavedweller Veteran

CPcavedweller

Posted
Posted
On 5/12/2021 at 1:12 PM, TheRumGone said:

As an organization, there's things you can do better as well," he said. "I'll just say this, for (offensive coordinator Joe) Brady's growth, that organization, they'll have to practice things in different ways. One of the things we didn't do much of when I was there, we didn't practice two-minute (situations), really. We didn't practice red zone ... (But) I'm appreciative of the opportunity and I just keep it moving."

 

I have a very hard time believing this

The lack of practice on 2-minute situations would explain why we sucked on drives that could've won the game.

The real issue was COVID restrictions. It was a problem for almost every QB in a new system other than Brady and Rivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...