Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What in the everloving fruit of the loom croissant butter is this?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Toomers said:

That’s not a reason at all. If he’s a complete flop as he has been are you starting him next year because they gave a 2nd for him? I don’t think so. 

   No effort involved. I can site actual numbers and facts and you make up theories like the one above. It’s your calling card of ignorance and has been for a long time. 

Exactly the kind of "my opinions are facts" response I'd expect from you.

Keep trying, dude. It's at least amusing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

You can always say so. You just can’t provide any logical reason for why it’s stupid and uninformed? I’m the one begging you to post anything that is a benefit of this. I’ve given reasons many times. If I’m so stupid and uninformed this should be easy. Yet you still can’t. Typical. Same as always. “Because someone said so” is your basis for every point. Nots facts. Not common sense. And certainly not actual football knowledge. If you had any you wouldn’t have to cling to every word you read on the internet. 

He always appeals to authority. He's a homer/bootlicker. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Varking said:

For those who dislike that we stuck with Darnold ( it’s known I wanted Fields ) compare Darnolds numbers against the Dolphins and Patriots and then compare it to everyone else. He was fine. He got completely owned by the Pats and Dolphins and he has like 16 TDs to 6 INTs in his career against the NFC, 

Its a known he sucked against the Pats and Phins. But being objective you’ll see against everyone else combined he looked like a good young QB. 

 

Dude, duck, or you'll be collateral damage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

This is obviously not true.

Has been calling for Hurney's head for years

Heck, Rivera's too. And I haven't exactly been Tepper's biggest fan either.

I genuinely try not to engage some of our dimmer elements, but sometimes I fail 😆

 

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Heck, Rivera's too. And I haven't exactly been Tepper's biggest fan either.

I genuinely try not to engage some of our dimmer elements, but sometimes I fail 😆

 

You're not smarter than everyone. And you avoid discussions that make you actually back. Up your claims. 

Posting a lot doesn't make you right. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Exactly the kind of "my opinions are facts" response I'd expect from you.

Keep trying, dude. It's at least amusing.

It’s not an opinion at all to say the Panthers just committed 19M more to Darnold with little to no upside. If there was any you would have posted it. That’s a fact. All I asked for was one thing. Yet you couldn’t even do that. 
 

   

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Most debates with Toomers are.

That depends on your definition of sad. Pointing out something factual to pop a homer balloon from someone who called you out. Then have that person not be able to defend his point at all is very sad. And typical. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...