Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina not done in the first


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Paa Langfart said:

Well cleveland won 11 games this year and it only took them how long to rise from the ashes?

 

They got a competent HC, and GM and things turned around. If Rhule, and Fritt have the same type of success? And so far it looks pretty good. We should be good to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

Well cleveland won 11 games this year and it only took them how long to rise from the ashes?

Well, six goes into 439, carry the 1958, divide by Otto Graham's number, subtract out Derek Anderson's touchdowns and well, they still haven't recovered yet.

They look promising. So did at least one NFC East team last July.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, chknwing said:

Trading up into the first round makes a whole lot of sense for Carolina especially if they want an LT.  It won't cost them that much.  This will also give them another player that they can have a 5th year option on.

This aged well. Ban.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I just tried a few mock draft simulators and this is the only way lol. Nothing else makes sense. 
    • No, biggest weakness is pass rush, but I don't think there is a blue chip can't miss DE prospect to take at #1 this year, same as with QB.  But beyond that, moving forward, yea WR is a pretty damn big weakness. We have 1 game this season over 224 yards passing and just traded away our best WR (who wasn't going to re-sign here anyways).  That WR no longer on the team was also the only player we've had this year who had over 78 yards receiving in a game.  So again, yea, WR is one of our biggest weaknesses even right now, let alone moving into the future. As I just said in my other post, I love Legette, but he's not going to be a Top 5-10 WR type of guy, Top 15-20 I can see, I think he can be a good #1 WR or an elite #2. After that, what do we have for the future?  Thielen isn't part of it, sure as hell isn't going to be Mingo, and as much as we all like Coker, in no world is Coker as our #2 to Legette as the #1 going be considered as "having weapons" at WR, even with Brooks and Sanders. But put someone like T-Mac into that group, who I genuinely think is going to be a Top 5 WR in this league for a long time, and it changes things.  A Top 5 WR with Legette/Coker as the 2/3, along with Brooks and Sanders, has the potential to be one of the best set of offensive weapons in the league if they reach their potential.  
    • At this range currently he’s probably a day 3 pick, but I think he will rise to day 2.
×
×
  • Create New...