Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: A.Rodgers wants out of Green Bay


firefox1234
 Share

Recommended Posts

How far in the future can draft picks be traded? Not sure what GB thought would happen, especially after drafting Love last year.

If I’m GB, I’m getting back on the phone with SF. 3rd overall, 2024 first rounder, handful of middle round picks  and players. If I still like Love, I’m trading back and stock piling additional picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I dont think SF has the draft assests.  take the 3, 43rd and next years 2nd.  I might do that.  But then SF would be absolutely playing russian roulette

Not saying SF just in general. I would get a fugton of draft capital from some team. Aaron is 37 and a pain in the ass. Get a haul and rebuild your team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, holderoftruth said:

How far in the future can draft picks be traded? Not sure what GB thought would happen, especially after drafting Love last year.

If I’m GB, I’m getting back on the phone with SF. 3rd overall, 2024 first rounder, handful of middle round picks  and players. If I still like Love, I’m trading back and stock piling additional picks.

Three years down the road is the max.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheRumGone said:

Not saying SF just in general. I would get a fugton of draft capital from some team. Aaron is 37 and a pain in the ass. Get a haul and rebuild your team.

I mean I would probably do it just to get him out of the building.

 

Also I just read that he just got married to a hollywood actress????  When the hell did that happen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, philit99 said:

That's why I mentioned, Brady. Rodgers going up against Brady twice in one year and seeing who can win the division. It could be an enticing offer, of course the Saints would be attractive too.  

I think the Saints will be the most likely landing spot in the NFCS, if any team besides SF has a shot.  Rodgers would fit right in with SP as both are huge dickheads.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I think the Saints will be the most likely landing spot in the NFCS, if any team besides SF has a shot.  Rodgers would fit right in with SP as both are huge dickheads.

Probably why it is a bad fit at the same time.  Two huge dickheads normally don't make for a good partnership.    

But I think Rodgers is looking for a Tom scenario.  What team is built where I can just walk in and go get a quick ring and have a say in how to go about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...