Super Bowl record of teams with turf on their home fields since 2010

[PhillyB]

30 minutes ago, Growl said:

you think that because it’s new it’s progressive and thus are apologizing for inherently unprogressive things
 

turf isn’t helping teams win super bowls

huh?

[Jorgie]

1 hour ago, WarHeel said:

What really matters is are these numbers statistically significant. Not sure 60% is a strong majority. 

As long as it’s not a strong minority we’re good

[TheMostInterestingMan]

7 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

huh?

Don’t mind him. I don’t agree with you on everything you align with politically but this guy is somehow trying to politicize grass... and not the grass the needs to be legalized in the state or NC. No, he’s trying to politicize the grass the Panthers play on. The draft needs to hurry the fug up and get here man.

Edited April 29, 2021 by TheMostInterestingMan

[rayzor]

37 minutes ago, Growl said:

you think that because it’s new it’s progressive and thus are apologizing for inherently unprogressive things
 

turf isn’t helping teams win super bowls

Looks like you are trying to veer into another discussion with that first statement, but to your second...turf definitely isn't a detriment to teams getting in and winning superbowls. Grass is better for health and aesthetics, but it won't interfere with our chances to win.

 

[mccjeff]

If they could add "grass stains" to turf it would be perfect.

[WarHeel]

21 minutes ago, Jorgie said:

As long as it’s not a strong minority we’re good

[ChibCU]

1 hour ago, PhillyB said:

Which is dumb, but on par for Carolina, a fanbase known to prefer gutty 7-9 seasons with a lunchpail quarterback doing things the traditional way. So it goes.

Yes, of course. All other fanbases have the correct take 100% of the time and their management never make a decision that looks bad in hindsight. Thank you for your valued input and for trashing an entire fanbase.

[Brooklyn 3.0]

You should also see what the field was for the Super Bowl itself.

[PhillyB]

12 minutes ago, ChibCU said:

Yes, of course. All other fanbases have the correct take 100% of the time and their management never make a decision that looks bad in hindsight. Thank you for your valued input and for trashing an entire fanbase.

huh

[Riverboat Ron]

I wanted all black turf to go with our all black uniforms 

[TheMostInterestingMan]

1 minute ago, Riverboat Ron said:

I wanted all black turf to go with our all black uniforms 

Sold

[Mhedrick]

....60% chance of going to the SB by having turf......

 

The other glaring analytic I saw is that over the past 10 years you had a 60% chance of being in the SB if TB12 was your quarterback!

 

If we had him and turf, that’s like a 120% chance of winning......Right?

[The Huddler]

2 hours ago, PhillyB said:

the only owner in the nfl to do so, undoubtedly 

TBH, I trust Tepper to build the Panthers brand. If turf, a dome, a new stadium... whatever he wants to do makes the panthers more popular, successful.. helps the city grow..  

..I'm all for it. 

 

Let the guy that grows money on trees grow the Panthers accordingly

[Kuhndog94]

11 minutes ago, Mhedrick said:

....60% chance of going to the SB by having turf......

That's, uh.... not how statistics work