Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Final first round predictions!


Jaxel
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't think we're really that interested in Fields. I think it's all been a coordinated smoke screen to trigger someone into trading with us. 

I doubt Sewell or Pitts will be there. 

If we trade back I have a nervous feeling we'll end up taking some guy none of us have even been discussing and it ends up being a letdown.

Edited by CanePantherHornet
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CanePantherHornet said:

I don't think we're really that interested in Fields. I think it's all been a coordinates screen to trigger someone into trading with us. 

I doubt Sewell or Pitts will be there. 

If we trade back I have a nervous feeling we'll end up taking some guy none of us have even been discussing and it ends up being a letdown.

🙄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CanePantherHornet said:

I don't think we're really that interested in Fields. I think it's all been a coordinates screen to trigger someone into trading with us. 

I doubt Sewell or Pitts will be there. 

If we trade back I have a nervous feeling we'll end up taking some guy none of us have even been discussing and it ends up being a letdown.

If it's a smokescreen it's a long one. There were very early reports that we loved Fields. Those have gone quiet until very recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, CanePantherHornet said:

I don't think we're really that interested in Fields. I think it's all been a coordinated smoke screen to trigger someone into trading with us. 

I doubt Sewell or Pitts will be there. 

If we trade back I have a nervous feeling we'll end up taking some guy none of us have even been discussing and it ends up being a letdown.

I don’t think we are “interested” in fields so somebody will trade with us. I think it’s so somebody will trade ahead of us and take a QB in hopes Chase, Sewell, or Pitts fall to us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We trade back 4 times, accumulate 14 total picks this year and an additional 4 next year. We choose a bunch of nobodies and the board goes crazy. 

7 months from now, we're laughing because our nobodies are undefeated and heading to the playoffs. People are writing about us in historical terms...greatest coaching job in the history of the NFL. Rhule is called the new Belichick. 

At the end of the season, Belichick retires and Rhule is hired by New England. Tepper offers Joe Brady a ridiculous amount of money to become head coach. He accepts. We proceed to go 6-11.

 

Or not.

Edited by Pup McBarky
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pup McBarky said:

We trade back 4 times, accumulate 14 total picks this year and an additional 4 next year. We choose a bunch of nobodies and the board goes crazy. 

7 months from now, we're laughing because our nobodies are undefeated and heading to the playoffs. People are writing about us in historical terms...greatest coaching job in the history of the NFL. Rhule is called the new Belichick. 

At the end of the season, Belichick retires and Rhule is hired by New England. Tepper offers Joe Brady a ridiculous amount of money to become head coach. He accepts. We proceed to go 6-11.

 

Or not.

It's kind of a vague prediction. Could you be a little more specific? 🤔

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fields makes too much sense. If Fields is there I think we take him. I think the competition between him and Darnold would make them both better and it’s a win for Carolina. Getting rid of Teddy removes a huge distraction that we didn’t need and could have hampered their development.  Get the guy that that can be a franchise QB and spend the second and third getting the best available tackles.  Hell, take all tackles and cornerbacks. 
 

I hope San Fran is dumb enough to take Mac Jones. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, so draft day...  and as I expected, I have a clearer idea of how my board breaks down.

I have it Fields/Lance, Sewell, then Horn/Surtain.

I have a feeling Fields, Lance, and Sewell will be gone.  I think we trade back a few spots and still take Horn or Surtain, and I give Horn a slight edge as my preference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Watching Rams/Eagles. Celebrating the St Louis Rams team that won the SB (Warner, Holt, etc..) while playing in Los Angeles seems wrong.  If I were in Los Angeles, no way I would attend a Rams game.  Probably wouldn't attend a Chargers game either.  Becoming a fan of a team that likes to move around just seems like a waste of energy as a fan.  
    • The only responses I am getting after providing statistics to put opinions in perspective seem to be from people who get angry and attack stats and people whose opinions differ from their own.  Have people on the Huddle ever overreacted, exaggerated, been wrong about players before?  Sure they have, so an alternative opinion with statistical support should not cause you to attack me or my views.  I am sorry your public schools failed you.  But your reactions are very revealing--you are stuck in Piaget's concrete operational stage--learn logic, how to debate a topic, and learn the difference between facts and emotional opinions.  When I paralleled Cam's stats with Jones' to point out how remarkably similar their careers have been to this point, It blew some 40 watt minds.  I think Jones, in a better situation, could be good--that should not upset you--
    • penalties and poor hands is what cost us in the RZ Bryce missing "high" in the back of the end zone is not an issue, you're taught as a QB to throw high in the back of end zone were only the receiver can catch or no one The duo of Ian Thomas and Tommy tremble can both go at the end of the season, both been here for multiple seasons and they've barely developed
×
×
  • Create New...