-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
First Round Draft Pick Prediction
131 members have voted
-
1. Choose the outcome.
-
Stand Pat and draft a QB.15
-
Stand Pat and draft an OT.66
-
Stand Pat and draft a TE.4
-
Stand Pat and draft a WR2
-
Stand Pat and draft another position.1
-
Trade up and draft a QB.1
-
Trade up and draft another player.0
-
Trade down and draft an OT.31
-
Trade down and draft a CB.8
-
Trade down and draft a QB0
-
Trade down and draft another player.3
-
Trade out of the first round entirely.0
-
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations -
You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player. If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect. So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb. -
Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level
-
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.