Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are You Really Against Fields or Lance if they fall to #8...


SetfreexX
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 4/16/2021 at 9:11 AM, t96 said:

Is Wilson really a given at #2? Everyone assumes it but I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if it's Fields. Many still think he's the clear #2 behind Lawrence, despite Wilson being the talk of the town more recently. Jets could have their cards very close to their chest and be targeting Fields. Lawrence is the only pick that is 100% set in stone.

Fields was #2 QB right after the end of the college season. I put more stock in that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think you strike while the iron is hot if one of the QBs falls to #8 because Darnold is to big of an unknown at this point ?.that also makes Darnold compete or let's say pushes him in camp in order to win the starting job instead of basically being unopposed. Then moreover on top of that if they both look good in camp even better especially if you draft Trey Lance who has the most potential. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Peppers90 NC said:

Yea people just repeating profiling assumptions. So sad.

Yeah exactly. Can you imagine the crap Fields would be getting if he was the one who got a DUI his freshman year. “Off fields issues” would be in every draft profile of him. Mac Jones on the other hand...

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sportscasting.com/driving-related-arrest-set-top-2021-nfl-draft-prospect-mac-jones-32-million-path-stardom/%3famp
 

“Was a turning point in his career.” It’s pretty sad. Fields was off the charts (literally) in that aptitude test for athletes. The man might have a photographic memory like Rodgers and Lebron. 
 

(this is no way hating on Mac, he was a 18 year old kid when that happened. It’s just to show you he gets different treatment.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You would have to pay me good money to party with that clown.
    • Morgan still has a little John Fox in him. Got to value those RBs even though they have been devalued for around a decade now. Never go more than 2-3 years on a contract unless he is a superstar, never pay high money and never draft a RB high unless you are set everywhere else. We failed on the first and third rules.
    • This is some good solid logic. I still go back to the teams think tank and it includes the current Dan Morgan, each looked over the roster of holes and came to a clear conclusion that the RB needed improving. They could have gave the same 2022 Miles contract to Hubbard, but didn't. Next up Morgan trades up for a RB with sanders and Hubbard here in his last year. While the edge group is lead bye Charles "panthers are the only team that wanted me " harris Hubbard keeps grinding and improves along with the OL, *now* months after seeing brooks on the field and watching hub get like 5.1 ypc...the brain trust goes and gives him a updated miles contract.........Just a odd timeline of events, I believe all of us can agree on that. Just the market is at the lowest its ever been for RBs and this team is 2-7 with other losing seasons with hubbard chugging along as a cheap rookie. I do agree with you sorta need 2 starting level RBs, so use a mid-rounder or sign one in FA for 2-4 per. Hubbard signed for more than King Henry, sure age and all. Id still want Henry for 8per over 2 years than hubbard 8.3 over 2(his cut point) Honestly part of is still pissed form the Herniay era and spending top draft picks and top level cap space on RBs. I love the guy but they even signed toldozer for upper money with stew and dwill, just poor management of resources. Now 20 years later, history repeats while the league is laughing at the Panthers. I want to over spend and over use draft capital on WRs, edge, and DL. At they rotate and play at the same time, panthers never used stew and dwill at the same time while both were top 5 paid. ugh 
×
×
  • Create New...