Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mitch Kupchak interview on WFNZ coming up.


Captain Morgan
 Share

Recommended Posts

"It is unusual to have 3 players of their magnitude out at the same time, but it's the time of the year when teams are dealing with injuries.  Don't feel sorry for yourself, this happens to everyone, try to find a way back."

Asked about trade deadline and standing pat.

"with Cody and Bismack being free agents, we don't know if they will be back, we looked at a trade but didn't find anything we thought was fair.  We're going to make the best of the season, develop our players."

how to you build with the 3rd youngest team in the NBA.  Around Melo?

"Rozier doesn't get as much credit as he deserves.  He's having a great year.  With Gordon and Melo we feel they are set.  at the 4 position we like our young players, and we'll continue to focus and develop them.  We didn't think Melo would be this good, so we're ahead of where we thought. "

Rozier coming up for a new contract.

"He's approaching a bigger deal.   He's been a consummate professional."

Hornets are 1 of about 6 teams with salary cap going into the next season...how does that affect you.

"With Gordon coming into Charlotte we didn't expect that but we had cap room.  It's unusual for a small market team to get a player like that, so it's important to have cap room.  Maybe someone will say I want to come play with our young players."

"If we lose Biz or Cody maybe we get another big.  It's too early to say."

 

 

 

 

Quote

 

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for transcribing this.

I'm glad they didn't make a trade they weren't crazy about. In years past, that is something the Hornets would have done.

I'm torn on giving Rozier a new contract. He has played well enough to earn one, but on the other hand, the team is still a ways off before they are a consistent winner. It might be best to trade him while he has a high value and keep rebuilding while Ball, Washington, and Bridges are still developing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

Thanks for transcribing this.

I'm glad they didn't make a trade they weren't crazy about. In years past, that is something the Hornets would have done.

I'm torn on giving Rozier a new contract. He has played well enough to earn one, but on the other hand, the team is still a ways off before they are a consistent winner. It might be best to trade him while he has a high value and keep rebuilding while Ball, Washington, and Bridges are still developing.

Rozier is young. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

And will want a big contract too. Mitch might prefer to give a long term extension to Monk or Graham, which should be cheaper, and using the leftover cap space for other players.

Graham isn't on the same level as Rozier. 

Monk has to prove he can be starter. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sign Rozier long-term.. it ain't even a question.. we have had to deal with Kemba and clowns for so long and can't even remember what it's like to have 2 good players - let alone 3 with Ball & Hayward!!
it's sad as a franchise, that the first thought when a player is doing well, is to trade him and get something else.. it's like players having a wide open layup but kick it out to the 3pt line.. ugh..

the core of Ball, Terry and Hayward is super solid.. finding a center and figuring out if PJ has reached his max-potential are key.. if we can keep Graham and Monk on team friendly deals that don't break the bank - it's a no brainer as well.. they can get hot in an instant and light it up from outside - but are streaky and might go 1-6 some nights..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...