McShay has us trading picks moving from 8th to 7th with Detroit to pick Lance

[rayzor]

Either we trade for it or someone else does and takes the available QB we have our eye on.

That's the only way it makes sense.

[LinvilleGorge]

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Either we trade for it or someone else does and takes the available QB we have our eye on.

That's the only way it makes sense.

This. If the QB we really want is there and we feel that other teams are knocking on the door then go fuging get our guy.

[pantherclaw]

I'd be disappointed if we traded up 1 spot. 

[pantherclaw]

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

Either we trade for it or someone else does and takes the available QB we have our eye on.

That's the only way it makes sense.

Absolutely. 

[rayzor]

26 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

I'd be disappointed if we traded up 1 spot. 

It would be frustrating move but it may be a necessary one to get our guy.

[bandu]

i think Lance will be one of the best QBs in this draft.

 

[micnificent28]

18 hours ago, Peppers90 NC said:

We’ll be lucky if either Fields or Lance are still on the board by 7. I certainly can’t see both available.

this is the correct answer

[cookinbrak]

4 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

I'd be disappointed if we traded up 1 spot. 

Luckily, stupid people dont run the draft.

[AU-panther]

On 4/3/2021 at 7:39 AM, panthers55 said:

https://www.derp/2021/4/1/22362214/carolina-panthers-trade-up-gamble-on-quarterback-trey-lance-nfl-mock-draft-todd-mcshay-espn

Maybe it is just me but why would we trade up from 8th to 7th with Detroit to pick a guy who will be there anyway. If they really wanted Lance they wouldn't make the trade and they likely won't go QB after trading for Goff. They need weapons around him like WRs.  If Detroit wanted a QB I could see us trading ahead of Detroit if we thought they wanted Lance but not with Detroit. Tell me where my thinking is flawed 

Lets say Fields is still on the board at 7 and we really like Fields.  Detroit calls and says "give us a third to move up one spot" or we are taking a future 1st from WFT to trade with them.  We give up a third to move one spot to insure we get the QB we like.

On 4/3/2021 at 8:02 AM, panthers55 said:

Then unless we think Lance is so much better than Fields we just let them and pick Fields and save our picks. Or that team picks Fields and we get Lance. 

You are thinking like a fan, not a team.  Most fans will be happy with any of the top-4 QBs.  Chances are though, that most teams, after lengthy evaluations, will definitely like one QB more than the other.  History though tells us that often those teams guess wrong, and sometimes not getting what you want ends up better.

 

 

[Peppers90 NC]

1 hour ago, AU-panther said:

Lets say Fields is still on the board at 7 and we really like Fields.  Detroit calls and says "give us a third to move up one spot" or we are taking a future 1st from WFT to trade with them.  We give up a third to move one spot to insure we get the QB we like.

That is pretty reasonable.

[ChibCU]

On 4/3/2021 at 9:15 AM, WarPanthers89 said:

We get a future franchise QB without trading multiple first round picks? Consider me sold. 

What are the gas prices like in 2027? I assume you've time travelled back here to give us this "future franchise QB" information.