Tony Pauline: Panthers sleeper team to trade for Sam Darnold

[top dawg]

38 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Darnold would be better than Bridgewater.

I'm not happy with investing the #8 pick + probably something else on the 4th QB in the Draft (I'm just not sold on Fields or Lance). I'd much rather spend it on a player that's going to improve the team - and keep that other pick to spend on another player that improves the team. 

How is it that you can be sold on Wilson, but not Fields or Lance, especially Fields considering from a statistical perspective, he's really not that far off from the golden boy, and is the most accurate of the QBs by a wide margin?

[OldhamA]

1 minute ago, top dawg said:

How is it that you can be sold on Wilson, but not Fields or Lance, especially Fields considering from a statistical perspective, he's really not that far off from the golden boy, and is the most accurate of the QBs by a wide margin?

Who said I'm sold on Wilson?

I simply don't discuss Wilson or Lawrence because they won't be there at #8 - and we'd be foolish to trade up for them.

[*FreeFua*]

Edited April 5, 2021 by *FreeFua*

[SetfreexX]

Need to simply say, I'd rather draft a mid round prospect like Mond over trading for Darnold. He only has the 5th year option left at this point, and that is IMO too high a cost for a player that remains in question. 

If we can't get Fields / Lance at #8 or maybe a trade up to #5 if ATL takes Pitts, I'd like to see us take SeWell or Slater in the 1st, and then look to bring in Mond or Newman on Day 2 with a solidified OL in front of him. 

 

OL - Sewell or Slater / Elflein / Paradis / Miller / Moton -- Key Reserves -- Erving / Little / Scott 

WR - Moore / Robby / Moore / our depth behind this

TE - Arnold / Thomas

HB - CMC / Draft Pick

QB - Teddy / Mond / Newman

------------------------------------

I think I'd like the potential of this collection of players, especially if we're able to trade back in Rounds 2 & 3 and use the additional picks to make use of taking a QB and extending our depth in other areas. 

Not to mention in this scenario TB is likely the stop gap QB to give the rookie time to get acclimated. 

Edited April 5, 2021 by SetfreexX

[45catfan]

Yeah, I just mocked this scenario because if 'our QB' is gone at #8, this almost certainly will go down.

[SetfreexX]

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Yeah, I just mocked this scenario because if 'our QB' is gone at #8, this almost certainly will go down.

You talking about what I posted, or something else?

[*FreeFua*]

Y’all ready?

[TheSpecialJuan]

[45catfan]

2 minutes ago, SetfreexX said:

You talking about what I posted, or something else?

Something else.   I literally just made a mock a little while ago in the draft subforum based on us trading for Darold because the 'big 4' were gone.  We are coming away with a QB on day 1 this year; either Lance, Fields, Jones or Darnold (via trade).  Bank on it.

[BurnNChinn]

2 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Who is that?

[45catfan]

16 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Who is that?

Juan posting his selfies again.

[TheSpecialJuan]

23 minutes ago, BurnNChinn said:

Who is that?

Our boy Tony Pauline 

[The Lobo]

This is a bummer to hear but isn’t this a report from every team every year that’s in the top 10 that doesn’t really need a qb? 

[BurnNChinn]

44 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Y’all ready?

Ready for what?