Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

49ers trading up to number 3 with Miami!


joemac
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SOJA said:

FWIW Bill Voth basically said today on twitter the Panthers weren't considering trading up into the top 4 

There is hope after all, Lance is still in play...... if the insane rumors are truth about Mac Jones to SF. Beagual will have to be in play, since Dolphins traded back to 6th. I doubt anyone else trade for the top 7 picks, only the beaguals is in play it seems. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Basbear said:

There is hope after all, Lance is still in play...... if the insane rumors are truth about Mac Jones to SF. Beagual will have to be in play, since Dolphins traded back to 6th. I doubt anyone else trade for the top 7 picks, only the beaguals is in play it seems. 

I think we could end up with Fields at 8 and I'm not kidding

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I think we could end up with Fields at 8 and I'm not kidding

Im about 90% sure Fields is ATLs target, so I seriously doubt he last that long. 

Right now the draft is playing out like this-

1. sunshine

2. wilson

3.    ...........................by some miracle Jones

4. Fields

5. Sewell

6.  Chase

7. ???

 

Edited by Basbear
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Im about 90% sure Fields is ATLs target, so I seriously doubt he last that long. 

Right now the draft is playing out like this-

1. sunshine

2. wilson

3.    ...........................by some miracle Jones

4. Fields

5. Sewell

6.  Chase

7. ???

 

Ben Allbright thinks they love lance

we have to pray SF takes Mac Jones and ATL takes Lance 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SOJA said:

Ben Allbright thinks they love lance

we have to pray SF takes Mac Jones and ATL takes Lance 

Im team lance, soooo I pray Mac=49(i just can not buy this, not now) Fields = ATL gets the hometown kid. btw its stilll farrrr too much for lance if that ends up being the pick. 

 

now think about the it.  Beaguals may not drafted Sewell, they signed Riley Reiff....hmmmmm They already drafted Jonah Williams. Im back to not knowing where they will go... Miami feels like a lock to draft a WR and Chase is the best one. 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright DW not just because I'm a Clemson fan but please don't be that sexual predator this franchise can't even lose right and is in love with getting out done by the likes of LOL Rivera and ofc Peyton.

But lets take a moment to clap and chew bubblegum. I'm bout to go rewatch that WTF game and be like yay a dub.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good news is we are going to get an elite player at 8 to waste right along side Cam, Luke, Olsen, Kalil, Gross, TD, Chinn, etc. All would be HoFers or potential HoFers with a competent GM/HC.

Ya know the type. the ones who don't call 7 step drops in the SB non stop until you've lost and that's literally the reason you lost. or run away top LTs and make them retire b/c they were ahead of the "you're a scumbag" train

Edited by Fox007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OldhamA said:

I disagree - the best I've seen that system run was when the Broncos had Jake Plummer - a mobile QB.

You have to have a mobile QB in that system to account for the athletic zone blocking Olinemen not holding up against the pass. 

I don't disagree, but Kyle Shannahan certainly seems to given the QBs he has been connected to and drafted lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

I disagree - the best I've seen that system run was when the Broncos had Jake Plummer - a mobile QB.

You have to have a mobile QB in that system to account for the athletic zone blocking Olinemen not holding up against the pass. 

So Jake Plummer over an MVP and what should’ve been a SB victory with Matt Ryan. Or if we’re counting his Dad’s teams, Steve Young 92-94 was his resume builder and got him the DEN job and b2b SBs with Elway. 
 

All very different type QBs and still managed to get the best out of all them. I can’t roll with the “Snake” Jr. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Toomers said:

So Jake Plummer over an MVP and what should’ve been a SB victory with Matt Ryan. Or if we’re counting his Dad’s teams, Steve Young 92-94 was his resume builder and got him the DEN job and b2b SBs with Elway. 
 

All very different type QBs and still managed to get the best out of all them. I can’t roll with the “Snake” Jr. 

Elway and Young were before my time.

As I understand it though they're both mobile QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • OL should be taken in the first three rounds at least every other draft. thank you for coming to my ted talk 
    • Wide receivers, even the great ones (and they are rare) can get real expensive, real quick and are involved in say 40-70% of a team's plays, based on that team's particular style of offense. An edge rusher, DT or LB can very often be involved in 100% of the plays on defense.  It's a much better, more cost effective pick to grab one of those defenders (who are easier to evaluate and plug into a system) than to spin out yet another pick on a wide receiver. We're fair to middling, maybe even good with receivers right now. And ignoring a need in a draft might just be the dumbest way to work a draft. Really, just think about what you said.
    • We almost won with basically JAGs on defense without Brown and you guys are dooming? If DB plays we win that game, no doubt in my mind.  We have more picks to make this year and it will be nice to spend at least 5 or 6 of them on defense. I would like at least one OL.
×
×
  • Create New...