Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Your "so far" take on Fitterer

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CarolinaLivin Veteran

CarolinaLivin

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I concur.

That said, do either Rhule or Fitterer report to the other?

In the traditional NFL model the chain of command is Owner > GM > Coach...

...do you believe it's something different with the Panthers?

Lmao I haven't been here long but bro... how do you get negative reputation that's crazy, didn't even know that was possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:
1 hour ago, SizzleBuzz said:

I concur.

That said, do either Rhule or Fitterer report to the other?

In the traditional NFL model the chain of command is Owner > GM > Coach...

...do you believe it's something different with the Panthers?

Expand  

@LinvilleGorge, if he spams the Appaloosa stuff one more time, I'd say you have just cause.

We have yet to establish who Fitterer reports to...

...seems like it would be important to know.

Do you know?

Seems like there are 3 options:

1.  Tepper >> Fitterer >> Rhule

2.  Tepper >> Rhule >> Fitterer

3.  Rhule <> Tepper <> Fitterer

Which do you believe to be the case?

Edited by SizzleBuzz
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Lmao I haven't been here long but bro... how do you get negative reputation that's crazy, didn't even know that was possible

Balance and accountability are very unpopular concepts with many folks --- I believe strongly in both.

[not to mention there are 2 or 3 guys who follow me around and ding every post I make -- it's easy to figure out who they are]

Edited by SizzleBuzz
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaLivin Veteran

CarolinaLivin

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, SizzleBuzz said:

We have yet to establish who Fitterer reports to...

...seems like it would be important to know.

Do you know?

Seems like there are 3 options:

1.  Tepper >> Fitterer >> Rhule

2.  Tepper >> Rhule >> Fitterer

3.  Rhule <> Tepper <> Fitterer

Which do you believe to be the case?

As of right now I would say Tepper > Rhule > Fitterer

I believe Rhule is making decisions, Tepper is making the call (yes/no call), and Fitterer is using his connections. 

My opinion obviously i dont know for sure

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CarolinaLivin said:

As of right now I would say Tepper > Rhule > Fitterer

I believe Rhule is making decisions, Tepper is making the call (yes/no call), and Fitterer is using his connections. 

My opinion obviously i dont know for sure

Seems logical.

Would be akin to Belichick with Patriots where he's the GM & HC...and the recently departed Nick Caserio who was Director of Player Personnel.

While non-traditional, it sure worked well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
razorwolf Collaborator

razorwolf

Posted
Posted

IMO I'm not sure the way you'd say the progression of the layout of who reports to who. I think it would probably look like this, but I may not be saying just right.

Tepper <> Fitterer <> Rhule

or

Tepper > Fitterer > Rhule

It is all discussed with Tepper since he's the owner of the team! Fitterer is using his connections, and Rhule makes the call (yes/no)

From what I've seen in other places. Fitt is the GM, Rhule has final say when it comes to the roster, and then I believe it's a combination of (Fitterer/Suleiman) that irons out the contrats

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SizzleBuzz Grand Master

SizzleBuzz

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, razorwolf said:

IMO I'm not sure the way you'd say the progression of the layout of who reports to who. I think it would probably look like this, but I may not be saying just right.

Tepper <> Fitterer <> Rhule

or

Tepper > Fitterer > Rhule

It is all discussed with Tepper since he's the owner of the team! Fitterer is using his connections, and Rhule makes the call (yes/no)

From what I've seen in other places. Fitt is the GM, Rhule has final say when it comes to the roster, and then I believe it's a combination of (Fitterer/Suleiman) that irons out the contrats

Both those scenarios seem to presume Fitterer is Rhule's boss.

Fitterer would be a direct report to Tepper...and Rhule would be a direct report to Fitterer.  [Tepper > Fitterer > Rhule]

This what you're thinking?

It would be nice to know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Lmao I haven't been here long but bro... how do you get negative reputation that's crazy, didn't even know that was possible

That is the most valuable rep on this web-site, Each one of those triggered poops is worth X1000 normal pie. I hate giving Sizzlebuzz any positive rep for that reason. Most login to alts to poop him too, compete cowards. Huddle is VERY serious to some, dont even get me started on the litterbox crew.... 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...