Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Orlovsky on Trey Lance


Troys99x4
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, Troys99x4 said:

Critical on the mechanics and the crew seems to agree. Harsh comparison too. 
 

if Fields runs a 4.2-4.3, you still taking Lance over Fields?

As long as the qb doesn't run super slow I don't think speed is what's going to make them a qb or not. There seems little chance Lance goes ahead of Fields. Nothing in their stories suggests that's a real thing. 

Fields played bug boy football while Lance barely threw the ball in minor league 

Edited by Moo Daeng
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, some footwork mechanics isn't a huge flaw. Kinda like how few WRs come into the league with a full route tree, few QBs come into the league with flawless mechanics that won't need some refining. 

I agree, but as he said in the video... Can a team find the QB's flaw and correct it before opposing DCs find that flaw and exploit it. That little hitch might only add half a second to a QBs release time, but that make a monstrous opportunity for the defense. 

Do we have a QB coach who can fix that kind of flaw? Can he actually spot and assess flaws, much less correct them. Will the QB himself be willing to put in the time to correct something, because it is not an overnight fix?

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They reached for Pickett, so they are not immune to it.  I could see that as well.  I just think the Colts are flying under the radar and they have been too quiet concerning their QB situation--of course, they could think Jones is their guy (they had a good one named Jones a long time ago) but I think they are done with the Richardson experiment.   Even if I believed in Jones, I would still draft a QB--I also read one mock that said the Jets would take Sanders if he falls to 7---I disagree, but I was once wrong and it still bothers me.
    • I just switched to prime video with fanduel south. Will I be able to watch the Canes playoff games still?
    • I mean, you can use that "logic," but the problem is that most practice squad players, backups or average guys don't put the play on film that Wharton did when given their opportunities.  Perhaps you'll end up right, but I don't think that just because a guy has been in a rotation makes him inherently less productive because he gets more snaps. I will say that the KC fans I've seen on social media loved him, and considered him their second best DT,  regardless of his "rotational" status, and generally considered him a dawg, so I'm going to give him the benefit of doubt until he shows otherwise.
×
×
  • Create New...