Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Explain this to me..Saints and the cap


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

It isnt voodoo. It isn't rocket science. 

They have done what they've done for a decade and just restructured contracts to convert base pay to league minimum and spread the signing bonus out over the length of the deal. 

Void years arent anything new. They've been around forever, hell we used them on Matt Kalil and recently on Paradis.

Thats it, there's literally nothing else to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/17/2021 at 1:34 AM, SmokinwithWilly said:

Every year this question is asked and every year Loomis works his voodoo and makes it happen. If they have a major setback this year and finish under 500, look for them to use 2022 to dump a ton of their cap problems. 

Expand  

You just said it.... its every year because they just keep pushing more and more money to future years cap space think of it as buying on credit.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They restructured Hill, which will push about $8mil into future dead money. 
 

They cut about $40mil in salary, including starters (LB Kwon Alexander, WR Sanders,  CB Jenkins, TE Cook, LG Eaton, P Morstead. 
 

They also “officially” still have Brees on the roster. Once he leaves they get hit with an additional $10.4mil hit, so even though they are “only” $11 mil in the hole, they need $5mil+ for cushion throughout the year and another $8mil for rookies. 
 

So they are still about $35mil in the red for ‘21, plus they’ve restructured contracts to push money to future years. And they have no franchise QB.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way the Saints do it is the way we did it with CMC and Shaq and every other team does it in the NFL.  The take a players current large salary, change it to a signing bonus and then they can spread it out over a 5 year period.  It lessens the cap hit for the current year but increases it for subsequent years.  It a player only has 1 or 2 years left on his current contract it mean they usually add voidable years at the end of the contract.  This ensures that their will always be dead money that hits the cap in the future because when the years void, which they will,  the remaining signing bonus hits the cap as dead money unless they sign a new contract.  

Every team does this, it's just the Saints do it every year and with multiple players a year.  It means they will never walk into a offseason with a lot of cap space and they will always have dead money on there books but they will always have room to add a least some players every year.  This only really hurts if you have multiple bad drafts in a row and don't have cheap rookies you can rely on to at least give you some playing time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 3/17/2021 at 12:02 PM, bababoey said:

The way the Saints do it is the way we did it with CMC and Shaq and every other team does it in the NFL.  The take a players current large salary, change it to a signing bonus and then they can spread it out over a 5 year period.  It lessens the cap hit for the current year but increases it for subsequent years.  It a player only has 1 or 2 years left on his current contract it mean they usually add voidable years at the end of the contract.  This ensures that their will always be dead money that hits the cap in the future because when the years void, which they will,  the remaining signing bonus hits the cap as dead money unless they sign a new contract.  

Every team does this, it's just the Saints do it every year and with multiple players a year.  It means they will never walk into a offseason with a lot of cap space and they will always have dead money on there books but they will always have room to add a least some players every year.  This only really hurts if you have multiple bad drafts in a row and don't have cheap rookies you can rely on to at least give you some playing time.

Expand  

so trading 3 #1's & multiple other picks plus young players on rookie deals for a single player is probably not a good idea?

Edited by Scott12345
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • 6 pages of tuka and Seltzer arguing is actually 97 pages long
    • 100%. And these same people will claim you have an agenda. You can't have it every way. We had the lowest rated defense in the league last year. Statistically the worst ever. By PFF grades (for whatever that's worth- but they are readily accepted, used, and conveyed by most "reputable" sources), the defense was the worst ever. Not only that, PFF rated our receiving corp the worst in football last season. The absolute worst... out of 32 teams. Which is why regardless of the lip service Canales and Morgan paid to the current guys, they knew it would be criminal not to give Bryce more help. People fixating on team stats and not taking these things into context are stupid, plain and simple, and I'm for one thankful they're not running this team (or probably anything for that matter bc they obviously can't discern reality. Again, going back to the eyeball test these Narrative Nancies seem to hate so much, did they not see the windows Bryce was putting balls into? Have the generally not watched much NFL? Please, please show me the film where all these NFL QBs are making throws like this to this point Bryce was "below average" down the stretch compared to them. Bryce made more wow throws in that 3 game stretch of the Bucs, Chiefs, and Eagles than every other QB combined in all the years since since Cam got hurt I genuinely am baffled by people that can watch throws like that and act like it's nothing. I guarantee you Steve Spagnola, Todd Bowles, and and Vic Fangio didn't think it was nothing after watching the little guy torch them with players those teams would be embarrassed to trot out at the skill position players. The national media spent all year making excuses for Mahomes not having elite weapons when he had multiple 1st & 2nd round talents at the skill positions along with future HoFers in Kelce and Hopkins. Bryce wasn't throwing for 300 yards every week with David Moore and Adam Theilen in spite of jaw dropping throws and you want to say the guy played below average. For those people, again, we ain't watching the same sport. And the name calling doesn't change that... The vitriol and projection... it's off the effing charts with these people.  
    • "Well you see if you remove this terrible game that terrible game this other terrible game and then focus on these games you'll see he's actually one of the better QB's in the league and he's actually as good as Jayden Daniels". My god this place is delusional. I love it.
×
×
  • Create New...