Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verge's Draft General thread 2021


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Who are you wanting at QB for us? Just curious...

I would like us to draft Wilson if we can move up without giving up the farm. But it depends on the asking price. The same with Watson. Who wouldn't want these guys? But if we stay at 8 I would be fine with Jones at that point more so than Lance.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Jesse said:

So I think with Matt Ryan’s restructuring we can clear them of selecting a QB at 4. I think we stay put at 8 and let a QB fall to us. If a QB isn’t available we get first dibs on the top corner. 

it just means they’re in a position to trade down, collect more pick, and laugh at us when we can’t move up to grab our guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

anyone who wants a QB and isn’t in their division. 

Here’s what makes ME laugh: their 35ish old QB will account for almost $50M in cap in ‘22, they just lost 5)384 starting safeties, only have one decent CB and one good defensive lineman in Jarrett. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...