Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC and Shaq restructured


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

"Oh my godddd it's like Hurney all over again!!!"

Or maybe...just maybe.......Hurney did things (some of which were very stupid) that every GM in the league does.  It'll be even more hilariously ironic if we end up drafting Parsons at 8th overall...even though I have it on good authority Hurney is the only GM in the history of the NFL who has ever drafted a LB or RB in the first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Mickey Loomis is 178-126 as an NFL GM. The Panthers are 200-215-1 as a franchise. One gets the benefit of the doubt due to success while the other has a lot to prove. 

So I assume your position is that if you are winning then do it by any means necessary but if you are losing then the cap issues are just more problems and not justified?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

GoOd ThInG wE hAvE a Rb AnD lB uNdEr CoNtRaCt!

pepsi GIF

There are mind numbingly stupid people in this thread. It’s like they think if you keep doing the same fuging thing we’ve done we’ll somehow see different results. We are a mediocre franchise and these are mediocre moves. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheRumGone said:

There are mind numbingly stupid people in this thread. It’s like they think if you keep doing the same fuging thing we’ve done we’ll somehow see different results. We are a mediocre franchise and these are mediocre moves. 

What are you talking about??? It not like theres history with these moves. Or the fact how other teams pay ILBs and RBs. Trends are dumb too, future learning my ass! Im not stoopid YOURE THE STOOPID ONE!!!1!1!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

So I assume your position is that if you are winning then do it by any means necessary but if you are losing then the cap issues are just more problems and not justified?

No. My position is that if you've proven that you can field a consistent winner you probably know what you're doing. Hopefully our crew will soon be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

There are mind numbingly stupid people in this thread. It’s like they think if you keep doing the same fuging thing we’ve done we’ll somehow see different results. We are a mediocre franchise and these are mediocre moves. 

In fairness, we could end up being wrong on our takes of this....but this just seems so disturbingly familiar. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, SmartyHurney3 said:

What the fug are you talking about you moron. Who cares about his injury. CMC is a stat whore for a position that typicall costs late round picks or a FA singing to be competitive at. He's failed numerous times with the game on his shoulders to score or gain 2 yards for a first down. He's a net negative. He does too much that is not his primary role, and too little at his primary role. The Panthers need 2 runningbacks because of his short yardage weakness. 

His contract is absurd.

Well then the GM that wrote it must be an absolute moron, right? 🙂

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know that. I'm not predicting it. Just putting the information out there so I will have receipts for later on when this dude turns into a stud at this level too.  It's kinda bittersweet, he'd help our offense out a great deal, but I'm wanting a QB next draft, so adding another weapon for Bryce is counterproductive in that regard.
    • I'm not sure if NO will be as QB aggressive as some assume.  They may focus on landing a top line prospect and slow rolling the rebuild for next year.  Could see them roll the dice in R3-4 to compete with Rattler, maybe a Howard fit.     I think the QB starved team's just take the gamble the Saints don't want Sanders, and target a mid to late 1st pick for a trade up to land him.  Still don't think Milroe or Shough are going R1.   But I think what may get lost in the trade up talk is about it being QB specific. A top team trying to get over the top could be the juicy trade (or two) that happens in round 1. Something I've flirted with is how aggressive Buffalo could be.  They have the ammunition for a big trade up, and I think Golden would pair super well with Coleman.  They need to cut to the chase and get playmakers there for Allen.  So yeah, love the idea of a BUF/ATL trade where they move up for him.  I'm even thinking about LAR getting aggressive for Warren or Loveland.  Imagine McVay rolling into 2026 with that added piece for a future QB...      
    • Unfortunately, Ice, there are some blueprints of hybrid LB/edge players who were busts too--Everette Brown is one, but he was forced into a 4-3 DE role here.  I would say that the 3-4 defense has a lot of wiggle room for hybrids at the OLB/Edge position--I am just not seeing Walker as an elite player at any one role.  Coverage?  Rushing the passer from the 9?  And at his size... If we take him, I hope that I am wrong because there are some personalities I really would love to be on this roster.  Jihaad Campell is one.  Bech is another. 
×
×
  • Create New...