Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF FA & draft preview for Panthers


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

PFF gives some analysis as to what we need to concentrate on, and possible fixes regarding a free agent and a draft prospect.  They specifically mention the O-line, and the offense in general with Curt's probable departure and the bottom-barrel TE room. Moreover, they believe we have a pretty much gaping hole at safety and could stand another cover corner considering how much cover 3 we play. 

Read the article for the particulars, but here's some QB stuff, which in their opinion is rightly the largest priority, as well as a bit on CMC.

 

 

 

On any QB needy team, including us:

"Any quarterback-needy team in the top 10 of this year's draft should consider drafting one of the top prospects. The top three players on PFF’s Big Board — Trevor Lawrence, Zach Wilson and Justin Fields — are all quarterbacks. All three are talented enough to be worthy of No. 1 overall pick consideration in a typical draft. That doesn’t even include Trey Lance, who PFF lead draft analyst Mike Renner labels as having both the strongest arm and the best rushing ability of any quarterback in this class. There are legitimate reasons to consider Alabama’s Mac Jones in the first half of Round 1, as well."

 

On CMC;

"The argument that his absence made the Panthers’ offense better in 2020 seems disingenuous at first glance...

"The basis of the argument for the Panthers' offense operating more smoothly with Mike Davis starting is that the team had become so reliant on McCaffrey that it was forgoing more valuable looks down the field to pepper him with targets near the line of scrimmage. In his absence, wideouts Moore, Anderson and Samuel showed what they could do as featured elements of the passing game.

"...the Panthers also need to make a concerted effort to avoid running their offense so heavily through their All-Pro running back."

 

On Watson:

"...My advice to Carolina if a Watson trade is on the table is the same advice I would give almost every other team in the league in that scenario: take it. PFF has written at length over the past several months about Watson's prowess and where he projects moving forward. He’s a young, franchise-altering quarterback..."

 

Fields gets a nod:

"Bringing in a talented quarterback on a rookie deal has clear benefits, however. The Panthers would likely have to trade up for either Zach Wilson or Justin Fields, but both of those players are worth it. Fields, specifically, boasts arguably the best accuracy of any quarterback in the draft class to go along with high-level rushing ability..."

https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-carolina-panthers-2021-free-agency-nfl-draft-preview

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

Everybody keep ignoring Trey Lance. Please.

I wouldn't say that they ignored him. Dude said he had the best arm and rushing ability in this class. To me, that speaks volumes! It's just that smart people realize that he will likely need more time than the others to develop. And, I'd argue that he is the hardest to evaluate simply from lack of the number of games that he played due to this missed season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, 54th man said:

Honestly I dont mind moving up to draft wilson or fields at 2 or 3 and moving to to 6 to draft lance IF all the other qbs are gone but no to mac jones unless it's a move down to get and that ain't happening 

Then we take Slater or Sewell at 8, and solve a different problem. Or see if anybody wants to move up a bit for a WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly He's played two seasons and started 28 games. He's well beyond the point of being able to point to 2 or 3 games and being able to say, "THAT is the QB he is and will be in the future" Of course he can get there, but anyone trying to use just those couple of games to rank his place amongst the games QB's today and their full career's worth of playing at that level, is just asinine. Mahomes, Allen, Lamar, Burrow, Hurts, Herbert, Daniels, Stafford, Goff, Geno, Purdy, Baker, Love, Dak, Tua, Kyler, Lawrence That's 17 QB's right there that have played better over their careers than Bryce has played at his best.  And I'm not saying they're all studs or guys I'd want to be our QB moving forward, Tua for example I wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole, but his body of work is a million times better than Bryce's has been. It's also not including any of the other QB's drafted in 2023/2024 other than Daniels. So again, say you believe in Bryce, say you think he's going to prove he can and should be our QB of the future, that's all fair and totally fine. But nobody can say he's been an above average QB in his career thus far, it's just an asinine notion.
    • I'd think we could get one of those from Dallas for... whatever. 
×
×
  • Create New...